š
Original date posted:2015-11-01
š Original message:On 10/30/2015 10:43 PM, Rusty Russell via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> By that benchmark, we should aim for "reasonable certainty". A
> transaction which would never have been generated by any known software
> is the minimum bar. Adding "...which would have to be deliberately
> stupid with many redundant OP_CHECKSIG etc" surpasses it. The only extra
> safeguard I can think of is clear, widespread notification of the
> change.
If the policy of Bitcoin Core development includes a willingness to
makes the utxos created by software other than Bitcoin Core unspendable,
then it certainly merits clear, widespread notification.
Even if that is actually a good policy, the reasons why should be made
abundantly clear.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0xEAD9E623.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 23337 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151101/1034f016/attachment.bin>;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151101/1034f016/attachment.sig>;
Justus Ranvier [ARCHIVE] /
npub1k2ā¦9qd6m
2023-06-07 17:44:00
in reply to nevent1qā¦7a2t
Author Public Key
npub1k2eekmevs6gg60df75qpjw4a2atmy89vx28c8zqq5jxy64tuzrws39qd6mSeen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 17:44:00Event JSON
{
"id": "66b729958fa8752f4050e11d682c340d25e0eef4436830ec1f0a04340cb0ce57",
"pubkey": "b2b39b6f2c86908d3da9f500193abd5757b21cac328f838800a48c4d557c10dd",
"created_at": 1686159840,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6fa3af2048f82399a81c9ef5aa9a6d88ff6b14b545801828e83f0dab2f1294d8",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a23dbf6c6cc83e14cc3df4e56cc71845f611908084cfe620e83e40c06ccdd3d0"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2015-11-01\nš Original message:On 10/30/2015 10:43 PM, Rusty Russell via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e By that benchmark, we should aim for \"reasonable certainty\". A\n\u003e transaction which would never have been generated by any known software\n\u003e is the minimum bar. Adding \"...which would have to be deliberately\n\u003e stupid with many redundant OP_CHECKSIG etc\" surpasses it. The only extra\n\u003e safeguard I can think of is clear, widespread notification of the\n\u003e change.\n\nIf the policy of Bitcoin Core development includes a willingness to\nmakes the utxos created by software other than Bitcoin Core unspendable,\nthen it certainly merits clear, widespread notification.\n\nEven if that is actually a good policy, the reasons why should be made\nabundantly clear.\n\n\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: 0xEAD9E623.asc\nType: application/pgp-keys\nSize: 23337 bytes\nDesc: not available\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151101/1034f016/attachment.bin\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 801 bytes\nDesc: OpenPGP digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151101/1034f016/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "7e8aa6d000cf73974acc87ce9e2dc2083219bb8083dc265eb59b36cdb1584b25dedec3e699e036adb5a8a8668162fdfa293d0c5bcf664d399bdd7ce9c8b5e9ba"
}