on Nostr: The VCs appear to be orthogonal/separate from any of the app data storage/interaction ...
The VCs appear to be orthogonal/separate from any of the app data storage/interaction layer, and I see they primarily use the JWT variant of VCs anyway. The data storage/interaction part is listed as DAG-CBOR, so no RDF involved. But aside from all these protocols there's a simple JSON canonicalization RFC here people should use instead of rolling their own, imo:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8785Published at
2023-05-21 15:02:01Event JSON
{
"id": "6e9db1c7f427417e6485376eeabdcbc9a0bce6ebbb83486d996ad19c895fee85",
"pubkey": "784e39dc3ad9d11bff0a1c11b37c81a58c64e13d17b76a7ddb04c45e55fffeee",
"created_at": 1684681321,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"324c34e8f079bbcc5de9993c3d711181409c9c989824875b12dcad1ebdebc99b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"b0427c66c35892a54e7cc0ec57e17b326a46ad0426a3c9762f932f5575cc8624",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"de7ecd1e2976a6adb2ffa5f4db81a7d812c8bb6698aa00dcf1e76adb55efd645"
]
],
"content": "The VCs appear to be orthogonal/separate from any of the app data storage/interaction layer, and I see they primarily use the JWT variant of VCs anyway. The data storage/interaction part is listed as DAG-CBOR, so no RDF involved. But aside from all these protocols there's a simple JSON canonicalization RFC here people should use instead of rolling their own, imo: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8785",
"sig": "3533d074dd9dfbc025725a5c1eeabeb910fe95fee02f7695c2c99579f832708301c5f88b959dd5f9d706535e0efb848190b97ccfec9d5c6c662c0e7f33ebf1b7"
}
