"I didn't say his argument rose to damnable apostasy."
No, you just insist that he hates Christ and such because... he disagrees with you about abortion, I guess? You're free to correct me on this if I'm not understanding this correctly though.
"His behavior does without repentance."
As far as I'm aware, and you're free to correct me on this, the only truly damnable and unforgiveable sin is the unrepentent rejection of Christ as the one true son of God who died for our sins, which I've yet to see him do here.
"and then he went on to say blacks have remained a 'consistent portion' (apparently he does not know what 'portion' means) of the population,"
Whether that's true or not, I really don't know. If you think he's going to hell for saying that or believing that, then, whatever I guess, but I'm not sure how you arrived at such a conclusion.
"and I went on the demonstrate that this in fact, is not true on it's face, and it would only get worse without abortion."
So is he going to hell because he has the "wrong" opinion on abortion then? Or is it the manner in which he disagreed? It's still not clear to me how either of those would rise to the level of damnation.
"Notably I made no moral statements about any of it,"
So it isn't about abortion proper then, I suppose? That's heartening, I guess.
"but he is desperate to move it into a morality argument to deflect that he got all the logic, math, and facts wrong."
Again, he could be factually wrong, I really don't know. Not my wheelhouse. But I still don't see where this escalates to going to hell.
"If one trusts someone who fails such as this,"
Theology isn't math or statistics or whatever else, if he's wrong about math, fine, but I don't think someone goes to hell if they believe sincerely that 2+2=5 so long as they aren't an apostate.
"I genuinely hope they are retarded, as such would provide the cover of unwilful ignorance upon judgement."
Well, I hope for all our sakes that a stats exam isn't required at the pearly gates, otherwise I'm still not sure what the issue is.
Chug Meridian /
npub1dg…amq5q
2023-05-31 02:09:45
in reply to nevent1q…5apx
Author Public Key
npub1dgrr3xdva8jgujy2uvupjfkpkxuy9lkm30g7w6wy2gpj42gtwa4s2amq5qPublished at
2023-05-31 02:09:45Event JSON
{
"id": "6ed54949ebd78fc3a689c7a1221065eca5b86db93ea86b29ef327e28033dfde5",
"pubkey": "6a063899ace9e48e488ae3381926c1b1b842fedb8bd1e769c452032aa90b776b",
"created_at": 1685498985,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"3684f93efe6dd69e3f876d779baec1541d95c7525d52e42ad0db7a7d14719322",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"fc89e58f5ebc31e0182185827a35b0875dd46d48a07f7675935fff5efe195992",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"1365d737f040c760c92f5afd8840a5c7a8f995903b2b9de3076ccabede407308",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"mostr",
"https://nicecrew.digital/objects/0b5f349d-6ebe-4854-a687-8a809968dbcc"
]
],
"content": "\"I didn't say his argument rose to damnable apostasy.\" \n\nNo, you just insist that he hates Christ and such because... he disagrees with you about abortion, I guess? You're free to correct me on this if I'm not understanding this correctly though.\n\n\"His behavior does without repentance.\"\n\nAs far as I'm aware, and you're free to correct me on this, the only truly damnable and unforgiveable sin is the unrepentent rejection of Christ as the one true son of God who died for our sins, which I've yet to see him do here.\n\n\"and then he went on to say blacks have remained a 'consistent portion' (apparently he does not know what 'portion' means) of the population,\"\n\nWhether that's true or not, I really don't know. If you think he's going to hell for saying that or believing that, then, whatever I guess, but I'm not sure how you arrived at such a conclusion.\n\n\"and I went on the demonstrate that this in fact, is not true on it's face, and it would only get worse without abortion.\"\n\nSo is he going to hell because he has the \"wrong\" opinion on abortion then? Or is it the manner in which he disagreed? It's still not clear to me how either of those would rise to the level of damnation.\n\n\"Notably I made no moral statements about any of it,\"\n\nSo it isn't about abortion proper then, I suppose? That's heartening, I guess.\n\n\"but he is desperate to move it into a morality argument to deflect that he got all the logic, math, and facts wrong.\"\n\nAgain, he could be factually wrong, I really don't know. Not my wheelhouse. But I still don't see where this escalates to going to hell.\n\n\"If one trusts someone who fails such as this,\"\n\nTheology isn't math or statistics or whatever else, if he's wrong about math, fine, but I don't think someone goes to hell if they believe sincerely that 2+2=5 so long as they aren't an apostate.\n\n\"I genuinely hope they are retarded, as such would provide the cover of unwilful ignorance upon judgement.\"\n\nWell, I hope for all our sakes that a stats exam isn't required at the pearly gates, otherwise I'm still not sure what the issue is.",
"sig": "0a5bc2eafe9a6e4b5ee1572be1dd2f77a3c130fe514faeede2bbec5630320d812cd0561efd49e4bbf3949c199e74bd697283d3c48e11e6a4b286233649979b94"
}