📅 Original date posted:2016-04-06
📝 Original message:To my understanding it is purely software thing. It cannot be detected from
outside if miner uses this improvement or not. So patenting it is worthless.
slush
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Mustafa Al-Bassam via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Alternatively scenario: it will cause a sudden increase of Bitcoin mines
> in countries where the algorithm is not patented, possibly causing a
> geographical decentralization of miners from countries that already have a
> lot of miners like China (if it is patented in China).
>
> On 01/04/16 10:00, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:41:40PM -0700, Timo Hanke via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I'd like to announce a white paper that describes a very new and
> significant algorithmic improvement to the Bitcoin mining process which has
> never been discussed in public before. The white paper can be found here:
> http://www.math.rwth-aachen.de/~Timo.Hanke/AsicBoostWhitepaperrev5.pdf
>
> What steps are you going to take to make sure that this improvement is
> available to all ASIC designers/mfgs on a equal opportunity basis?
>
> The fact that you've chosen to patent this improvement could be a
> centralization concern depending on the licensing model used. For example, one
> could imagine a licensing model that gave one manufacture exclusive rights.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing listbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.orghttps://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160406/06ef680b/attachment.html>;
Marek Palatinus [ARCHIVE] /
npub1xt…acz68
2023-06-07 17:50:03
in reply to nevent1q…6x00
Author Public Key
npub1xtqansnal58rjnnxvyke6kzuvxsz0twg4456awy6ff0525yqgjxqjacz68Seen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 17:50:03Event JSON
{
"id": "62de5404d02d5ab7cfc6d7a1828ea543186f42f620dc4030c1b0ba72da15de00",
"pubkey": "32c1d9c27dfd0e394e66612d9d585c61a027adc8ad69aeb89a4a5f455080448c",
"created_at": 1686160203,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"795c5aad8a484a5ef712947a3dbff6f73056df3d20100cce60abef6b3a680ecb",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"0580ec0ff7806ea12f691b02cc9b0d36d0c0e7004b3a50609c59814b8f6f7d8e",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"e6463bded8530d9750d0dba218a16739f7b235c9d33e69103341c2a88f0fdeac"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-04-06\n📝 Original message:To my understanding it is purely software thing. It cannot be detected from\noutside if miner uses this improvement or not. So patenting it is worthless.\n\nslush\n\nOn Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Mustafa Al-Bassam via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Alternatively scenario: it will cause a sudden increase of Bitcoin mines\n\u003e in countries where the algorithm is not patented, possibly causing a\n\u003e geographical decentralization of miners from countries that already have a\n\u003e lot of miners like China (if it is patented in China).\n\u003e\n\u003e On 01/04/16 10:00, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:41:40PM -0700, Timo Hanke via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e Hi.\n\u003e\n\u003e I'd like to announce a white paper that describes a very new and\n\u003e significant algorithmic improvement to the Bitcoin mining process which has\n\u003e never been discussed in public before. The white paper can be found here:\n\u003e http://www.math.rwth-aachen.de/~Timo.Hanke/AsicBoostWhitepaperrev5.pdf\n\u003e\n\u003e What steps are you going to take to make sure that this improvement is\n\u003e available to all ASIC designers/mfgs on a equal opportunity basis?\n\u003e\n\u003e The fact that you've chosen to patent this improvement could be a\n\u003e centralization concern depending on the licensing model used. For example, one\n\u003e could imagine a licensing model that gave one manufacture exclusive rights.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing listbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.orghttps://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160406/06ef680b/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "9900b42253f0d4c952335566a4c3538becadfd8e418af859fc10a2a7eb06216fd01fbce96bf613bf88e5e8dc0d3596994903ccc73033b09a11cfe0d93626df8a"
}