Anthony Accioly on Nostr: Just seen this (been out of Nostr for a while)... Something like this should already ...
Just seen this (been out of Nostr for a while)... Something like this should already been happening (the part about querying servers from a nostr kind and falling back to whatever server implements its). The problem is that most clients haven't fully implemented Blossom. I think that linking the image directly to a URL is a good measure given that I dont expect clients to fully support blossom soon, and most clients will render a URL correctly. So my take on it is, keep Blossom links as is and annoy client devs to implement proper retrieval / fallback according to BUD-03.
Published at
2025-04-30 17:28:28Event JSON
{
"id": "62a2184e59b40446322b74e22fc5400d7d830af5dd6cc37e4c6c0dc83c78019b",
"pubkey": "ee9d979e7e1418a9f7472baf82dc96082a0d4251b77bcb170a6ecec93fadff64",
"created_at": 1746034108,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"67f550458d7f469e7eda284efb615f22b1d759cfc35876659f649ed28131071f",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"e2ccf7cf20403f3f2a4a55b328f0de3be38558a7d5f33632fdaaefc726c1c8eb"
]
],
"content": "Just seen this (been out of Nostr for a while)... Something like this should already been happening (the part about querying servers from a nostr kind and falling back to whatever server implements its). The problem is that most clients haven't fully implemented Blossom. I think that linking the image directly to a URL is a good measure given that I dont expect clients to fully support blossom soon, and most clients will render a URL correctly. So my take on it is, keep Blossom links as is and annoy client devs to implement proper retrieval / fallback according to BUD-03.",
"sig": "87c184a790727216f03303b383e6bec0a1f6eca6c67d45f3b3b8847f456cdb9a4401f20aa232486e903d0097e00d12431d7f17d7efd3e371910b3999513e6b9a"
}
