📅 Original date posted:2011-10-10
🗒️ Summary of this message: A pool operator will no longer use bitcoind for Eligius and will instead use custom software designed to efficiently create work.
📝 Original message:>
> > > As I will no longer be using bitcoind for Eligius soon
> >
> > What will you be using instead? Isn't bitcoind a requirement for running
> a
> > pool?
>
> Writing some custom software designed to more efficiently create work.
> To clarify, bitcoind will still serve the purpose of peering with external
> nodes and picking out valid transactions to be accepted into blocks; it
> just
> won't be involved in the primary operations of the pool.
>
Ah, I see. Sounds a bit like the direction Steve is going with poolserverj.
So your custom software would handle incrementing the extraNonce,
recalculating the merkle tree/root, and so on?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20111010/c1609a96/attachment.html>;
Mike Hearn [ARCHIVE] /
npub17t…4qgyd
2023-06-07 02:32:50
in reply to nevent1q…pw0g
Author Public Key
npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgydPublished at
2023-06-07 02:32:50Event JSON
{
"id": "62c7d1f5b463fd0eecae1e007c0e18359f1dc57fbd8cd05b4ec39f08c4442cda",
"pubkey": "f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2",
"created_at": 1686105170,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"1de0fa2aca5e0afb92553689a67121bb3c0f37c59d386aea4ba802016f3e46d4",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"27db49d5fc31ad26854a6b1d9e8d65337a57429f05e2211c38e5f59ee0ad9f43",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"6ac6a519b554d8ff726a301e3daec0b489f443793778feccc6ea7a536f7354f1"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2011-10-10\n🗒️ Summary of this message: A pool operator will no longer use bitcoind for Eligius and will instead use custom software designed to efficiently create work.\n📝 Original message:\u003e\n\u003e \u003e \u003e As I will no longer be using bitcoind for Eligius soon\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e What will you be using instead? Isn't bitcoind a requirement for running\n\u003e a\n\u003e \u003e pool?\n\u003e\n\u003e Writing some custom software designed to more efficiently create work.\n\u003e To clarify, bitcoind will still serve the purpose of peering with external\n\u003e nodes and picking out valid transactions to be accepted into blocks; it\n\u003e just\n\u003e won't be involved in the primary operations of the pool.\n\u003e\n\nAh, I see. Sounds a bit like the direction Steve is going with poolserverj.\nSo your custom software would handle incrementing the extraNonce,\nrecalculating the merkle tree/root, and so on?\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20111010/c1609a96/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "69b4cec7f5d51011c3927e3b59bdf81089d7bfecc81b372ce51b5671b51813f0d22dce3e7ad42c8971833b03a659ea7d7c15003d33ce25d5a3d7c84c2fec6350"
}