kortelange on Nostr: Interesting perspective with lightning channels, but something in the past affecting ...

Interesting perspective with lightning channels, but something in the past affecting something in the future does not mean entanglement.

Are you able to provide a proof instead of just words? I do not see how a mined block violates a bell inequality, again do you have a proof?

It is not easy to show whether an arbitrary quantum state is entangled or not, but if you could describe a protocol for generating a bell state using two UTXOs that would be very interesting. If you can not generate a certain state, what decoherence is solved? You have no quantum-information on the state, so there is no quantum information to be lost.

Anyways, I am signing of social media till next saturday. Thanks for taking time to respond.