screwlisp on Nostr: Writing at least one article per day on veers into a certain kind of technical debt- ...
Writing at least one article per day on
https://screwlisp.small-web.org/ veers into a certain kind of technical debt- like, I write an article pointing out that while modern type theory proofs are (probably) great, lisp has been writing formally correct programs since the 70s without the branding of type theory by ACL2 (Nqthm).
Well, show me some examples. But what I'm focused on is what I haven't written yet.
Same when I say "cons tree visualisations as fractal structural types"...
Published at
2025-06-14 04:36:18Event JSON
{
"id": "6d2848022bbf604dbb8df176ea95ba4c6235b1ec97d99a76b707cde7b7419115",
"pubkey": "88d7015a50f6bc0b5063e08d4423093c80862c83f18073fd287fccbbe87324ac",
"created_at": 1749875778,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://gamerplus.org/users/screwlisp/statuses/114679859001675570",
"activitypub"
],
[
"client",
"Mostr",
"31990:6be38f8c63df7dbf84db7ec4a6e6fbbd8d19dca3b980efad18585c46f04b26f9:mostr",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
]
],
"content": "Writing at least one article per day on https://screwlisp.small-web.org/ veers into a certain kind of technical debt- like, I write an article pointing out that while modern type theory proofs are (probably) great, lisp has been writing formally correct programs since the 70s without the branding of type theory by ACL2 (Nqthm).\n\nWell, show me some examples. But what I'm focused on is what I haven't written yet.\n\nSame when I say \"cons tree visualisations as fractal structural types\"...",
"sig": "ec54660788f4a68b5d7ae844dd565d62ac9ba49e0b8f56c3ed80fcbbf27d63dde384ce394d3e17b820d10b17e3c5e19ce87896202e5e267fbcd3ba93d0de7c23"
}