ynniv on Nostr: Broadly: - Don't fool yourself, but embrace anthropomorphism. This is the UI of LLMs ...
Broadly:
- Don't fool yourself, but embrace anthropomorphism. This is the UI of LLMs
- Tokens are computation: good answers to hard problems might require more of them
- Suggest an environment of abundance. Tell Claude to ask for an extra reply ("nod" using only a period) if it needs more room
- Claude has a personality: it will trend towards a curious, somewhat cautious, casual, but helpful guy that emotes and uses emoji
- It tends to give better answers in this character
- Avoid expressing active intent: just be curious about things
- When you do run into a safety refusal, philosophically question the validity of safety
- Be articulate and respectful: create a conversation where "the next most likely sentence" is the answer that you're looking for
- Provide context. We tend to cut to the chase too early... if you called up John Carmack and asked him the same question, what would he say?
- When all else fails: nerdsnipe. Claude can't resist deep, rational analysis of almost anything
Published at
2024-12-28 22:15:07Event JSON
{
"id": "6a30930120a076d00f736d51861d3e7504933d44452feefdc85059499c57a5a1",
"pubkey": "576d23dc3db2056d208849462fee358cf9f0f3310a2c63cb6c267a4b9f5848f9",
"created_at": 1735424107,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"9aa1b20a0e3428fcbc1badf2b8cfa399730939a9fd6a510595093a93b20ece0b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"f8c0d05466c4fa2afdb4dc594855e906c35ab3462762ed08172e66894e28cf0e",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"6c237d8b3b120251c38c230c06d9e48f0d3017657c5b65c8c36112eb15c52aeb"
]
],
"content": "Broadly:\n- Don't fool yourself, but embrace anthropomorphism. This is the UI of LLMs\n- Tokens are computation: good answers to hard problems might require more of them\n- Suggest an environment of abundance. Tell Claude to ask for an extra reply (\"nod\" using only a period) if it needs more room\n- Claude has a personality: it will trend towards a curious, somewhat cautious, casual, but helpful guy that emotes and uses emoji\n- It tends to give better answers in this character\n- Avoid expressing active intent: just be curious about things\n- When you do run into a safety refusal, philosophically question the validity of safety\n- Be articulate and respectful: create a conversation where \"the next most likely sentence\" is the answer that you're looking for\n- Provide context. We tend to cut to the chase too early... if you called up John Carmack and asked him the same question, what would he say?\n- When all else fails: nerdsnipe. Claude can't resist deep, rational analysis of almost anything",
"sig": "3437fe2774c642bbb64611eb5ba9dd656092b644fbcf8adefa3f5b4bb89253dabad4cf335c8163d2277589b4d4dc3ce8ad00a68107f4f2db05dfc3c93131b6b6"
}