đ so funny! Youâre still pretending that I didnât send you direct quotes from Peter and Matt! We all know why you ignore them. Youâre not capable of responding. You were so overconfident and now youâre just embarrassed.
Here, Iâll send them again so everyone following you can see youâre pretending not to see them.
Here is Peter admitting that both CAT and CTV add risks. He says:
âUnlike OP_CAT, CTV doesnât appear to raise much risk of unintended consequences beyond encouraging out-of-band fee payments in certain cases. This isnât ideal.â
The risk that Peter identified for CTV is âencouraging out of band fee paymentsâ.
https://petertodd.org/2024/covenant-dependent-layer-2-review
Hereâs Matt Corallo explaining why these can motivate miner centralization:
https://x.com/TheBlueMatt/status/1780558009841643833
Matt argues that these payments to miners are a risk because they encourage centralization:
âMore recently, out of band payments to miners have become popular again, allowing individuals to pay large pools for the inclusion of their transaction(s) using payments outside of the normal bitcoin transaction fee. This can create substantial MEVil [centralization MEV risk] [âŠ]â
There you go! You can keep ignoring them but we all know that I sent them and you couldnât respond.
đ«ł đ€
techfeudalist /
npub1nzâŠ0yxqu
2024-09-11 05:45:11
in reply to nevent1qâŠfp0u
Author Public Key
npub1nz3cd3mx4jf9paxwrdgqvchaprjdge9pj9t58mkusw74q5saajkqu0yxquPublished at
2024-09-11 05:45:11Event JSON
{
"id": "6af5ac1d86663c27e3745a29e6a2f1fc4ece1c7724dff4e8e3de4d076f6b63ab",
"pubkey": "98a386c766ac9250f4ce1b500662fd08e4d464a1915743eedc83bd50521decac",
"created_at": 1726033511,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"a6abb26444d62656e63b8bf3070e98e8aa16db7c08487a22802eebc83139dc60",
"wss://relay.exit.pub",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"37596e369d031cac1a465a53a4da5e7f38ef18eeae0cba4c9656a6ce9fa0de5a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"428c7eb534e106bba3ada46710f4e9e36291318b632b12de0fafdaa53d55283e"
],
[
"p",
"053935081a69624466034446eda3374d905652ddbf8217c88708182687a33066"
],
[
"r",
"https://petertodd.org/2024/covenant-dependent-layer-2-review"
],
[
"r",
"https://x.com/TheBlueMatt/status/1780558009841643833"
]
],
"content": "đ so funny! Youâre still pretending that I didnât send you direct quotes from Peter and Matt! We all know why you ignore them. Youâre not capable of responding. You were so overconfident and now youâre just embarrassed. \n\nHere, Iâll send them again so everyone following you can see youâre pretending not to see them. \n\nHere is Peter admitting that both CAT and CTV add risks. He says:\n\nâUnlike OP_CAT, CTV doesnât appear to raise much risk of unintended consequences beyond encouraging out-of-band fee payments in certain cases. This isnât ideal.â\n\nThe risk that Peter identified for CTV is âencouraging out of band fee paymentsâ. \n\nhttps://petertodd.org/2024/covenant-dependent-layer-2-review\n\nHereâs Matt Corallo explaining why these can motivate miner centralization:\n\nhttps://x.com/TheBlueMatt/status/1780558009841643833\n\nMatt argues that these payments to miners are a risk because they encourage centralization:\n\nâMore recently, out of band payments to miners have become popular again, allowing individuals to pay large pools for the inclusion of their transaction(s) using payments outside of the normal bitcoin transaction fee. This can create substantial MEVil [centralization MEV risk] [âŠ]â\n\nThere you go! You can keep ignoring them but we all know that I sent them and you couldnât respond. \n\nđ«ł đ€",
"sig": "457635678969e8e1cd6e98a8b7c63c825e2dc3db95c5faf91fb13d947ecf48918e665261283c8fbb76024907804ddc5fccc6b2728157a77ca5081261c76bb4fd"
}