📅 Original date posted:2022-05-06
📝 Original message:On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 2:01 PM Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> Russell O'Connor wrote the definitive explanation for how ST arose in
>> the consensus process and how it was designed to make everyone
>> unhappy. It's a great explanation of what we went through last year.
>>
>> https://r6.ca/blog/20210615T191422Z.html
>>
>> "On Building Consensus and Speedy Trial"
>>
>> on | 2021-06-15T19:14:22Z
>> by | Russell O'Connor
>>
>
> That's a lot of text, are you sure he said in there he designed speedy
> trial to make everyone unhappy?
> Well, if we're still talking about it, that proves that it failed at its
> own design criterion of failing fast.
>
Quoting from https://r6.ca/blog/20210615T191422Z.html:
> Speedy Trial’s design is not based on any sort of activation philosophy
about failing fast.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220506/7b1fba52/attachment.html>;
Russell O'Connor [ARCHIVE] /
npub1dw…8plrw
2023-06-07 23:08:41
in reply to nevent1q…3szh
Author Public Key
npub1dw88wd5gqsqn6ufxhf9h03uk8087l7gfzdtez5csjlt6pupu4pwsj8plrwPublished at
2023-06-07 23:08:41Event JSON
{
"id": "68c8a0536ce2da8df53f6e0ee8652a1da091825a87cb6aa6c23686761b47726c",
"pubkey": "6b8e77368804013d7126ba4b77c7963bcfeff909135791531097d7a0f03ca85d",
"created_at": 1686179321,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"2c7446924006565199055354ceaa67a177a6b76cd51f01f2e04527cea83d385a",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"6af748e71ef0363d6b13daced41a1b8722d65ef12c61f7acd01baa8bbe57fb08",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2022-05-06\n📝 Original message:On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 2:01 PM Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e\n\u003e Russell O'Connor wrote the definitive explanation for how ST arose in\n\u003e\u003e the consensus process and how it was designed to make everyone\n\u003e\u003e unhappy. It's a great explanation of what we went through last year.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e https://r6.ca/blog/20210615T191422Z.html\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e \"On Building Consensus and Speedy Trial\"\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e on | 2021-06-15T19:14:22Z\n\u003e\u003e by | Russell O'Connor\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e That's a lot of text, are you sure he said in there he designed speedy\n\u003e trial to make everyone unhappy?\n\u003e Well, if we're still talking about it, that proves that it failed at its\n\u003e own design criterion of failing fast.\n\u003e\n\nQuoting from https://r6.ca/blog/20210615T191422Z.html:\n\n\u003e Speedy Trial’s design is not based on any sort of activation philosophy\nabout failing fast.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220506/7b1fba52/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "d908af38b56e5857b1e177955d39fed0f1bad39454588f5ca2e02fa761f629b7003586ce7be2df983b5e274e9e28a8227a44edcdb5e0b0d3fe577acc49f6aa8a"
}