📅 Original date posted:2017-06-20
📝 Original message:I don't think it's a huge deal if the miners need to run a non-Core node
once the BIP91 deployment of Segwit2x happens. The shift will most likely
be temporary.
I agree that the "-bip148"-option should be merged, though.
2017-06-20 17:44 GMT+02:00 Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>:
> Are we going to merge BIP91 or a -BIP148 option to core for inclusion in
> the next release or so?
>
> Because a large percentage of miners are indifferent, right now miners
> have to choose between BIP148 and Segwit2x if they want to activate Segwit.
>
>
> Should we be forcing miners to choose to run non-core code in order to
> activate a popular feature?
>
> - Erik
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170620/dcdeace9/attachment.html>;
Hampus Sjöberg [ARCHIVE] /
npub10u…hln8t
2023-06-07 18:03:26
in reply to nevent1q…vqmj
Author Public Key
npub10uzud4rf4636awmfgvarmcfndcmdnv8rfd2y3rx2sqgckv9zur4qahln8tPublished at
2023-06-07 18:03:26Event JSON
{
"id": "652e57ba390d436404a1e59d5f1b8a26649be7fab9ef90ab545f0677e1183d63",
"pubkey": "7f05c6d469aea3aebb69433a3de1336e36d9b0e34b54488cca80118b30a2e0ea",
"created_at": 1686161006,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f10d3c1837e5518719736f82b51f13e32ba605e8e3996b8db87dad10332b09a3",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"cfcc20fd7953e969dbf79e27f07ed29c0bdd91b3fad325ec0d0d0128c2229407",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"22944ce1e29904e3826d25013a614e4665693ec514003efacc1b7586e8e5d0aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-06-20\n📝 Original message:I don't think it's a huge deal if the miners need to run a non-Core node\nonce the BIP91 deployment of Segwit2x happens. The shift will most likely\nbe temporary.\n\nI agree that the \"-bip148\"-option should be merged, though.\n\n2017-06-20 17:44 GMT+02:00 Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e:\n\n\u003e Are we going to merge BIP91 or a -BIP148 option to core for inclusion in\n\u003e the next release or so?\n\u003e\n\u003e Because a large percentage of miners are indifferent, right now miners\n\u003e have to choose between BIP148 and Segwit2x if they want to activate Segwit.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e Should we be forcing miners to choose to run non-core code in order to\n\u003e activate a popular feature?\n\u003e\n\u003e - Erik\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170620/dcdeace9/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "c486d5c150210641817db5af29c2284565ebff6f7fdec98ffa9c057b125ed52b5cedaa834f775c8036c5d79405f93fd40274432e6baacb68af247abe523519f8"
}