Event JSON
{
"id": "679dd151ce3a40c991fde635252c544be33fdd4a79d4b328d26704ed1cdf236f",
"pubkey": "f8bb95387db659f0ecbfabdf9e83f03c7ad471a31dfbf6283bf09186d776b4db",
"created_at": 1705174155,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"91432d0ad8712118d596a743a22aaeaff40c4858b5df69948863bda455488ca2",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"85c220e6add040d8bb71a25235f7d631d82c5356bcd4c0578b393c17b870d4e7",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"e2a922fc1aad4ad79a0651be230f56f1cb3195a9dcf90833c1ed56dc3278ca75",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.lawprofs.org/users/lpramsey/statuses/111750293438385092",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1j9pj6zkcwys334vk5ap6y24w4l6qcjzckh0kn9ygvw76g42g3j3qfk6kez Descriptive fair use doctrine does not adequately protect free expression because it does not apply if the use is as a trademark. We need a trademark for use doctrine that protects trademark uses of a term for its inherent informational or dictionary meaning, and not just uses in parody, comparative advertising, and other expressive or informational uses of marks that refer to the trademark owner.",
"sig": "fc5efa3262e2775d930ab215c7f28245c6baa33f606b595c55caff983d8fd420e12dfcff59d68b218394ebc6f6864a3780bb50ac8674b9b56848e23f86951905"
}