📅 Original date posted:2016-03-25
📝 Original message:On Thursday 24 Mar 2016 13:20:48 Chris via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> As far as the use cases others mentioned, connecting and SPV wallet to
> your full node is certainly one. It would make it easy to, say, connect
> the android bitcoin-wallet to your own node. I've hacked on that wallet
> to make it connect to my .onion node, but it's very slow border-line
> unusable. Basic encryption and authentication would make that viable.
What about using some interface, much like the JSON one (but more likely the
zeroMQ one) instead? Would that not solve the problem?
I'm thinking that would not be a replacement for a full-node-connection but in
addition.
Which means that some questions can be asked over that channel that you need
authentication for. It would be a much better separation of concerns.
Tom [ARCHIVE] /
npub1h3…8z4k5
2023-06-07 17:50:00
in reply to nevent1q…dft8
Author Public Key
npub1h394c0pkdum0jw4rufslt3ur9m9c2ym4x7a0t68spfpjr6zlq3msu8z4k5Published at
2023-06-07 17:50:00Event JSON
{
"id": "e1713164982e47602d5bd585f7fdb7da3168b4737695335f3ff7a72196985c92",
"pubkey": "bc4b5c3c366f36f93aa3e261f5c7832ecb85137537baf5e8f00a4321e85f0477",
"created_at": 1686160200,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"1c87d471b2f2da141b64e0a9c480b3ca53986e57331a196cd0234d6c8fb75484",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"21e0afd64b0f0db8713eb28fa4607e280649fcbdf71c2cd32a2a51699a42c5cf",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"94ba46cdbb14c3443fcc2e1278b41ad6bc36a2d595149d6940652dab7e162523"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-03-25\n📝 Original message:On Thursday 24 Mar 2016 13:20:48 Chris via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e As far as the use cases others mentioned, connecting and SPV wallet to\n\u003e your full node is certainly one. It would make it easy to, say, connect\n\u003e the android bitcoin-wallet to your own node. I've hacked on that wallet\n\u003e to make it connect to my .onion node, but it's very slow border-line\n\u003e unusable. Basic encryption and authentication would make that viable.\n\nWhat about using some interface, much like the JSON one (but more likely the \nzeroMQ one) instead? Would that not solve the problem?\n\nI'm thinking that would not be a replacement for a full-node-connection but in \naddition.\n\nWhich means that some questions can be asked over that channel that you need \nauthentication for. It would be a much better separation of concerns.",
"sig": "bafb2fd2e034781d767dd889b8a69917b71048d62ce439bf8a95e73d46015a06b3367fd178a8ad26109b0e2cac8aff2698a4dca46a69c585cec79261ce01dd47"
}