📅 Original date posted:2015-05-29
📝 Original message:On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen at gmail.com>
wrote:
> What do other people think?
>
>
> If we can't come to an agreement soon, then I'll ask for help
> reviewing/submitting patches to Mike's Bitcoin-Xt project that implement a
> big increase now that grows over time so we may never have to go through
> all this rancor and debate again.
>
> I'll then ask for help lobbying the merchant services and exchanges and
> hosted wallet companies and other bitcoind-using-infrastructure companies
> (and anybody who agrees with me that we need bigger blocks sooner rather
> than later) to run Bitcoin-Xt instead of Bitcoin Core, and state that they
> are running it. We'll be able to see uptake on the network by monitoring
> client versions.
>
>
>
While I think we'd all prefer Core to make changes like this, the current
environment may make that impossible. If this change happens in XT, we will
support the necessary changes in our own implementation. The block size
limit is a problem _today_, and I'd rather we solve today's problems with
today's understanding rather than let speculation about future unknowns
stop our ability to respond to known issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150529/64fa5360/attachment.html>;
Bryan Cheng [ARCHIVE] /
npub1zw…jkh0g
2023-06-07 15:34:09
in reply to nevent1q…xpne
Author Public Key
npub1zw5sx3at9e7k6yvpuw7dnsxdcfmch5ngrkfvxdsuwwmn5c0ue4wqajkh0gPublished at
2023-06-07 15:34:09Event JSON
{
"id": "e101a9f8b0f128ab1e0206552cd955db7348f041e88e4cedfd512e5c284dd261",
"pubkey": "13a90347ab2e7d6d1181e3bcd9c0cdc2778bd2681d92c3361c73b73a61fccd5c",
"created_at": 1686152049,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"aec396df7693e37c124fbd2891fe6c4a3b28f46e7fbc3f304a7b1d78d2f5ffbe",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"0b35b8644f20eb16bfd1785d674927cd82895c116b11d6cda30519001c4f9c6d",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"3a24ce2145c5488aebfb0fc113e7d44234e9d3733afa45e2d880eb259c3eade3"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-05-29\n📝 Original message:On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Gavin Andresen \u003cgavinandresen at gmail.com\u003e\nwrote:\n\n\u003e What do other people think?\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e If we can't come to an agreement soon, then I'll ask for help\n\u003e reviewing/submitting patches to Mike's Bitcoin-Xt project that implement a\n\u003e big increase now that grows over time so we may never have to go through\n\u003e all this rancor and debate again.\n\u003e\n\u003e I'll then ask for help lobbying the merchant services and exchanges and\n\u003e hosted wallet companies and other bitcoind-using-infrastructure companies\n\u003e (and anybody who agrees with me that we need bigger blocks sooner rather\n\u003e than later) to run Bitcoin-Xt instead of Bitcoin Core, and state that they\n\u003e are running it. We'll be able to see uptake on the network by monitoring\n\u003e client versions.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\nWhile I think we'd all prefer Core to make changes like this, the current\nenvironment may make that impossible. If this change happens in XT, we will\nsupport the necessary changes in our own implementation. The block size\nlimit is a problem _today_, and I'd rather we solve today's problems with\ntoday's understanding rather than let speculation about future unknowns\nstop our ability to respond to known issues.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150529/64fa5360/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "cfebe2c7ef9704b0e39ddd3342cc91cac7841e3394070d20dcd7d960c11ee47b24a5bf79cda7db8ae3b178c344d1f0b539b0279264253d03c99b00cb55ea17b4"
}