Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2013-05-08 📝 Original message:On Thu, May 09, 2013 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2013-05-08
📝 Original message:On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:39:10AM +1000, Addy Yeow wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Can someone explain why do we have 32-bit and 64-bit timestamp fields
> instead of all being 64-bit?
>
>
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Protocol_specificationWho knows?
Satoshi used 32-bits and those fields can't be changed now without every
single Bitcoin user changing all at once. (a "hard-fork" change)
We'll probably need to do one of those eventually for other reasons, so
we might as well leave fixing the timestamps until then.
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000002a9a85a940c4da2951c3e91a043a44805fa286b336364d9daa
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130508/06a79d4c/attachment.sig>
Published at
2023-06-07 15:01:32Event JSON
{
"id": "e75977a20bcce3ae48f27637a50feeb2d89a2293c171c1d398f485745551563a",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686150092,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"94096a540659922fb308765fd366df049294303f58802ee2f87aef70df5f594b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"fb02d852c0847e8032d48594fe6c7930be3f7adbac50575e39d3ac430ad327a5",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"b25e10e25d470d9b215521b50da0dfe7a209bec7fedeb53860c3e180ffdc8c11"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-05-08\n📝 Original message:On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:39:10AM +1000, Addy Yeow wrote:\n\u003e Hi list,\n\u003e \n\u003e Can someone explain why do we have 32-bit and 64-bit timestamp fields\n\u003e instead of all being 64-bit?\n\u003e \n\u003e https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Protocol_specification\n\nWho knows?\n\nSatoshi used 32-bits and those fields can't be changed now without every\nsingle Bitcoin user changing all at once. (a \"hard-fork\" change)\n\nWe'll probably need to do one of those eventually for other reasons, so\nwe might as well leave fixing the timestamps until then.\n\n-- \n'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n000000000000002a9a85a940c4da2951c3e91a043a44805fa286b336364d9daa\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 490 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130508/06a79d4c/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "641d817ebac3ad0be30dd445b7877a306f3c7783bed0290906afbdb43b5cd66ca957b679f8bdf9006f2c1898d76fdd98f74078720cd3701c4335c6d15e16a20e"
}