ThePhD on Nostr: When someone decides to make up entire bungles of horse shit in their "explanation" ...
When someone decides to make up entire bungles of horse shit in their "explanation" and "apology" (
https://archive.ph/Utaz1 ) about the weird shit they did.
I want off this fucking ride.
"Postpone to 2024"? Present at a "tier 2 conference"? My reasoning is contained directly in my blog post (
https://thephd.dev/i-am-no-longer-speaking-at-rustconf-2023#-huh ). If you're going to fucking lie about me at least try and be fucking accurate about it:
“It is also deeply confusing and ultimately insulting for them not to contact me beforehand and simply ask me if I would disclaimer my work to make it clear that they did not explicitly endorse this direction. Multiple times before the RustConf schedule and program was released, I made it obscenely clear that there was not going going to be an RFC for the work I was talking about (“Pre-RFC” is the exact wording I used when talking to individuals involved with Rust Project Leadership), that this might bias folks, and whether or not it would be okay to do this. Individuals in contact with me both inside and outside RustConf leadership made it abundantly clearly that this topic was perfectly fine. Furthermore, they had already met to discuss my work before hand, so at no point should anyone be confused about what my intentions and goals are.”
That someone would try to use game-of-telephone bullshit to make it seem like I deserved to have my keynote outright removed (which was the ACTUAL SUGGESTION given to RustConf, and they changed it to a DOWNGRADE to prevent bigger fallout from Triplett and Tolnay's CLEAR oversteps and, apparently, outright lies here!), or that I was in agreement with such a removal, when I literally took the required time to make a proper assessment of the situation and respond like an ADULT, is some WILD nonsense!
Is this a common Rust Project occurrence? Do people just do this ALL THE TIME? WHAT IS GOING ON OVER THERE?!
Edit: added some fucking alt-text because I'm so fucking annoyed at this bullshit.
Published at
2023-09-04 05:13:17Event JSON
{
"id": "ee4afda08a91b16072c1597d2e056eebb9048422df1edf32b717d5fc0fe24f77",
"pubkey": "2845572814e3205908fd23768b14285a03b693513bfb9b7087435924b04bc19e",
"created_at": 1693804397,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://pony.social/users/thephd/statuses/111005164984251004",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "When someone decides to make up entire bungles of horse shit in their \"explanation\" and \"apology\" ( https://archive.ph/Utaz1 ) about the weird shit they did.\n\nI want off this fucking ride.\n\n\"Postpone to 2024\"? Present at a \"tier 2 conference\"? My reasoning is contained directly in my blog post ( https://thephd.dev/i-am-no-longer-speaking-at-rustconf-2023#-huh ). If you're going to fucking lie about me at least try and be fucking accurate about it:\n\n“It is also deeply confusing and ultimately insulting for them not to contact me beforehand and simply ask me if I would disclaimer my work to make it clear that they did not explicitly endorse this direction. Multiple times before the RustConf schedule and program was released, I made it obscenely clear that there was not going going to be an RFC for the work I was talking about (“Pre-RFC” is the exact wording I used when talking to individuals involved with Rust Project Leadership), that this might bias folks, and whether or not it would be okay to do this. Individuals in contact with me both inside and outside RustConf leadership made it abundantly clearly that this topic was perfectly fine. Furthermore, they had already met to discuss my work before hand, so at no point should anyone be confused about what my intentions and goals are.”\nThat someone would try to use game-of-telephone bullshit to make it seem like I deserved to have my keynote outright removed (which was the ACTUAL SUGGESTION given to RustConf, and they changed it to a DOWNGRADE to prevent bigger fallout from Triplett and Tolnay's CLEAR oversteps and, apparently, outright lies here!), or that I was in agreement with such a removal, when I literally took the required time to make a proper assessment of the situation and respond like an ADULT, is some WILD nonsense!\n\nIs this a common Rust Project occurrence? Do people just do this ALL THE TIME? WHAT IS GOING ON OVER THERE?!\n\nEdit: added some fucking alt-text because I'm so fucking annoyed at this bullshit.\n\nhttps://cdn.pony.social/media_attachments/files/111/005/142/803/015/620/original/96774221e2768faa.webp",
"sig": "b3ffba217d4c4989c09975b5a07e74d43999b898bb7c12be041da0d05fd5c0d37763599fae2710f29ce460e65e225d4c700015e7427b223a4c8fa5b8657003d7"
}
