nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqtkxrms5s56y2a2wlvkvl84vtz06mde0w4j7avemyq5wsg0699lfq4kljvd (nprofile…ljvd)
>"Better in principle" but not in practice
I forgot that in practice too, but on a state level
https://www.richardhanania.com/p/forty-years-of-economic-freedom-winning
>I didn't say it was an either or
You said you weren't fond of DEI either, which implied a picking between bad and worse.
Society that prides itself on "egalitarianism" is bad, because it's a utopian aspiration based on creationist tier assumptions.
It brings better results simply because it's a belief disproportionally held by elites. As a belief it's destructive, because outside of the naive elites, it fuels/is fueled by ethnic resentment. It too requires yes men willing to ignore that the oppressed don't share your utopian ideals.
>Trump's "yes men" are also very "diverse" as well, which is an irony in of itself
There is no irony. You see it simply because you've built a strawman.
> "Might makes right".
Might doesn't make right, but it's not feasible to have right without might.
>But there is nothing here about "reform" or "fixing" the problem
Yeah, I do kinda that Cofnas doesn't really much offer a way forward. However you simply can't not have elites.
>He is against Trump, then for Trump, then against him, then for him, then against...
Where is he for Trump?
>C(r)apitalism
There's simply no reason to blame capitalism here because the problems you're claiming it causes are either largely exaggerated or not real
>"Source: Heritage foundation"
Cmon you gotta have something better than that