📅 Original date posted:2019-07-26
📝 Original message:On 7/23/19 10:47 AM, Andreas Schildbach via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> 3) Afaik, it enforces/encourages address re-use. This stems from the
> fact that the server decides on the filter and in particular on the
> false positive rate. On wallets with many addresses, a hardcoded filter
> will be too blurry and thus each block will be matched. So wallets that
> follow the "one address per incoming payment" pattern (e.g. HD wallets)
> at some point will be forced to wrap their key chains back to the
> beginning. If I'm wrong on this one please let me know.
Maybe someone who knows better can confirm but I thought I read the the
fp rate on the filter was chosen assuming a wallet would average a
certain number of addresses (ie, they assumed use of an HD wallet). Your
criticism might be valid for wallets that well exceed the average.
Chris [ARCHIVE] /
npub1jj…uchtw
2023-06-07 18:19:38
in reply to nevent1q…e3aa
Author Public Key
npub1jjaydndmznp5g07v9cf83dq6667rdgk4j52f662qv5k6klsky53sruchtwSeen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 18:19:38Event JSON
{
"id": "e59ff6116af3efdf38a43ed360d0e55afba4a5f6428fffa4369a78bfe15c5175",
"pubkey": "94ba46cdbb14c3443fcc2e1278b41ad6bc36a2d595149d6940652dab7e162523",
"created_at": 1686161978,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"9984a06ec701a8f6ac2773e4a62741a4d9d15af90b1fce9ee03180b7fd819eec",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"4e708e244134df046651216d17433de7facc52aad234ff656645eed4955e3f74",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"cd753aa8fbc112e14ffe9fe09d3630f0eff76ca68e376e004b8e77b687adddba"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2019-07-26\n📝 Original message:On 7/23/19 10:47 AM, Andreas Schildbach via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\n\u003e 3) Afaik, it enforces/encourages address re-use. This stems from the\n\u003e fact that the server decides on the filter and in particular on the\n\u003e false positive rate. On wallets with many addresses, a hardcoded filter\n\u003e will be too blurry and thus each block will be matched. So wallets that\n\u003e follow the \"one address per incoming payment\" pattern (e.g. HD wallets)\n\u003e at some point will be forced to wrap their key chains back to the\n\u003e beginning. If I'm wrong on this one please let me know.\n\nMaybe someone who knows better can confirm but I thought I read the the \nfp rate on the filter was chosen assuming a wallet would average a \ncertain number of addresses (ie, they assumed use of an HD wallet). Your \ncriticism might be valid for wallets that well exceed the average.",
"sig": "1945bfdf80a2e7a768c37b880f294478a81186c54c9b8b403185881eff1e831c2700eda2d65a9de8ffd4220704d098c38ca02eb50cb8a9e411380e1fde1ff9e4"
}