📅 Original date posted:2018-05-08
📝 Original message:
>From what I understand talking to folks, the linear properties of these
signature tricks are maintained under a number of post-quantum schemes.
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Benjamin Mord <ben at mord.family> wrote:
>
> If I'm not mistaken, the scriptless scripts concept (as currently
> formulated) falls to Schor's algorithm, and at present there is no
> alternative implementation of the concept to fall back on. Correct? Lest we
> build a house of cards, I'd strongly urge everyone to not depend on
> functional concepts whose underlying cryptographic primitives cannot be
> swapped in an emergency.
>
> Sure, we use ecdsa for example (which is also vulnerable to Schor's
> algorithm), but in contrast to scriptless scripts we have a variety of
> backup primitives at our disposal that fulfill the same functional
> objective.
>
> If scriptless scripts are found possible under lattice-based cryptography
> for example, that would be something I suppose. The functional concept of
> scriptless scripts is indeed very awesome - we just need to add some
> cryptographic conservatism before we build on it.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lightning-dev mailing list
> Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20180508/5b5bfa6b/attachment.html>;
Greg Sanders [ARCHIVE] /
npub1jd…3gh0m
2023-06-09 12:50:40
in reply to nevent1q…se0g
Author Public Key
npub1jdl3plz00rvxwc6g2ckemzrgg0amx5wen4kfvs3laxtssxvk9cvsf3gh0mPublished at
2023-06-09 12:50:40Event JSON
{
"id": "e85b22f3353c2046e604fd6ded74d5f80d60fcc705ca28194bd17cf43b7d0e78",
"pubkey": "937f10fc4f78d8676348562d9d886843fbb351d99d6c96423fe9970819962e19",
"created_at": 1686315040,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"a140aca1ee6330ebac0e6e71b974dad50152279c9e0bbc01b5138c6fc06c41b5",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"bf755fd4839edc8fe0497d8440f7698663a0fc62cba47bcd5458fb05b6369519",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"d130dddcd486171bc7d87324949ff9f03e12d9f3441741929356952d22d980e1"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2018-05-08\n📝 Original message:\n\u003eFrom what I understand talking to folks, the linear properties of these\nsignature tricks are maintained under a number of post-quantum schemes.\n\nOn Tue, May 8, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Benjamin Mord \u003cben at mord.family\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e\n\u003e If I'm not mistaken, the scriptless scripts concept (as currently\n\u003e formulated) falls to Schor's algorithm, and at present there is no\n\u003e alternative implementation of the concept to fall back on. Correct? Lest we\n\u003e build a house of cards, I'd strongly urge everyone to not depend on\n\u003e functional concepts whose underlying cryptographic primitives cannot be\n\u003e swapped in an emergency.\n\u003e\n\u003e Sure, we use ecdsa for example (which is also vulnerable to Schor's\n\u003e algorithm), but in contrast to scriptless scripts we have a variety of\n\u003e backup primitives at our disposal that fulfill the same functional\n\u003e objective.\n\u003e\n\u003e If scriptless scripts are found possible under lattice-based cryptography\n\u003e for example, that would be something I suppose. The functional concept of\n\u003e scriptless scripts is indeed very awesome - we just need to add some\n\u003e cryptographic conservatism before we build on it.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e Lightning-dev mailing list\n\u003e Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev\n\u003e\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20180508/5b5bfa6b/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "22f063ed363b1f65e9c1f077d4cbe0751831893604527575ade9ed682601343a1b005a54fe4f33839c87c584c3bd95446a252ba4a7d9693f46a9fce6d109883d"
}