Americans,
On Thursday, the #scotus will be hearing arguments where lawyers for the criminal defendant are arguing that all former presidents are forever immune from criminal prosecution for any official acts done in office.
Failure to respect the election of a new President, is the ultimate crime against the people, who are the basis of government. The President, by constitutional design, should have no role- official or unofficial-in the determination of the people's
vote. Immunity for the crimes here alleged would be most abhorrent to the Framers, because immunity would upset the constitutional scheme and aid a President in overriding the people's power over him.
The Framers would also have been appalled that Trump, despite having left office, seeks permanent immunity. As a Federalist wrote for the Maryland ratifying convention:
It seems, however, that the president may possibly be continued for life. He may so, provided he deserve it.
🧵 1️⃣
Kailee♾️Kamala Harris 🇺🇸🇺🇦 /
npub1k0…cnktl
2024-04-21 19:53:46
Author Public Key
npub1k0v9vgutnqjqgfm0a2qnp953wrnfzv847skhmus5zf9sj98jruqqecnktlPublished at
2024-04-21 19:53:46Event JSON
{
"id": "e86198db6b096e29b9dbcdd05ee65d58df816375a5a89e731711337a2b8e3e70",
"pubkey": "b3d856238b982404276fea8130969170e69130f5f42d7df214124b0914f21f00",
"created_at": 1713729226,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://sfba.social/@skykiss/112310958581191408",
"web"
],
[
"t",
"scotus"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://sfba.social/users/skykiss/statuses/112310958581191408",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://sfba.social/users/skykiss/statuses/112310958581191408",
"pink.momostr"
]
],
"content": "Americans,\n\nOn Thursday, the #scotus will be hearing arguments where lawyers for the criminal defendant are arguing that all former presidents are forever immune from criminal prosecution for any official acts done in office.\n\nFailure to respect the election of a new President, is the ultimate crime against the people, who are the basis of government. The President, by constitutional design, should have no role- official or unofficial-in the determination of the people's\nvote. Immunity for the crimes here alleged would be most abhorrent to the Framers, because immunity would upset the constitutional scheme and aid a President in overriding the people's power over him.\n\nThe Framers would also have been appalled that Trump, despite having left office, seeks permanent immunity. As a Federalist wrote for the Maryland ratifying convention:\n\nIt seems, however, that the president may possibly be continued for life. He may so, provided he deserve it. \n\n🧵 1️⃣",
"sig": "e1cac83fc8ae920874fe9307ceb6752b9932916ae89edc3c029c2c6d3ff94f3160b05624af17afa7ab79b98ca2812c6bbc31df1c3a627a0bd5227957b255f66e"
}