Gavin Andresen [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-06-26 📝 Original message:I completely agree with ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-06-26
📝 Original message:I completely agree with Pieter: usage will grow to fill whatever maximum
block size the miners decide to allow (or whatever maximum block size is
imposed by minimum transaction fees or a hard cap on block size).
I am not scared by increased usage, though: more usage and adoption means
more investment, more smart engineers, and more people with incentives to
solve whatever scaling problems crop up. All of that makes Bitcoin stronger.
And I don't feel like this process has been hurried: I've been working on
this (thinking, testing, simulating, talking, writing code, talking to key
people and companies) almost exclusively since late last year. In my humble
opinion, BIP 101 is a good compromise between "no limit, let the miners
decide" and "lower the max size so a raspberry pi running on a 56K modem
can be a full node."
--
--
Gavin Andresen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150626/6143a1be/attachment.html>
Published at
2023-06-07 15:40:29Event JSON
{
"id": "e1b8df4459b3cb0a5ae2b2f147d45e132c04b206a256d256cc84b570de0fd66d",
"pubkey": "857f2f78dc1639e711f5ea703a9fc978e22ebd279abdea1861b7daa833512ee4",
"created_at": 1686152429,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6b97b8772e4c3c0f5eb751746063b4217197a3eb7cab2fa3b16264082ad573c4",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"49b906ae0cb1c650d03b21983343908355e50aa02a3d91e555af4d895a4bc9aa",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"dc329a02c970aabf03b87185ef51c86afe4586fe3a148508af898af3fabc56a3"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-06-26\n📝 Original message:I completely agree with Pieter: usage will grow to fill whatever maximum\nblock size the miners decide to allow (or whatever maximum block size is\nimposed by minimum transaction fees or a hard cap on block size).\n\nI am not scared by increased usage, though: more usage and adoption means\nmore investment, more smart engineers, and more people with incentives to\nsolve whatever scaling problems crop up. All of that makes Bitcoin stronger.\n\nAnd I don't feel like this process has been hurried: I've been working on\nthis (thinking, testing, simulating, talking, writing code, talking to key\npeople and companies) almost exclusively since late last year. In my humble\nopinion, BIP 101 is a good compromise between \"no limit, let the miners\ndecide\" and \"lower the max size so a raspberry pi running on a 56K modem\ncan be a full node.\"\n\n\n-- \n--\nGavin Andresen\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150626/6143a1be/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "1e9220c3892b0c3fbe15215d4a7840a394ff2f6ea93f9502990031029e32ff7281c289d452ef8bdbe179228133043585439be1625f3373fd0df8f696570acb7c"
}