📅 Original date posted:2014-01-15
📝 Original message:"Routing address" is pretty good too. Unsure whether the synergy and
familiarity with bank routing numbers improves the situation, or
not...
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Roy Badami <roy at gnomon.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:44:17PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> "static address" seems like a reasonable attempt at describing intended
>> use/direction.
>
> ...as opposed to an address configured by DHCP?
>
> More seriously, I don't think a typical user will understand anything from
> the phrase "static address". But it is a neutral name, and it is shorter
> than "address-of-a-type-for-which-reuse-is-not-deprecated". :-)
>
> -roy
--
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
Jeff Garzik [ARCHIVE] /
npub1kf…f3f58
2023-06-07 15:11:42
in reply to nevent1q…6f6j
Author Public Key
npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58Published at
2023-06-07 15:11:42Event JSON
{
"id": "e1eeb1802af11c068a4b19e35144c222f0d03469e0a6f6d1753b9e3a8c3a44b6",
"pubkey": "b25e10e25d470d9b215521b50da0dfe7a209bec7fedeb53860c3e180ffdc8c11",
"created_at": 1686150702,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6b79d8c7bec3dc6952db91cc68d0510d9897c37dcf58a24d8e2f4288fe42525c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"8bcc48c654b9493abb0f2e39e75f7c6dc205cbd46ce6ada61c505e9a6ab65041",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"58f160e0dbc661605704b190e36f5199f881c861e53763c7057e6bc0c13e6950"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-01-15\n📝 Original message:\"Routing address\" is pretty good too. Unsure whether the synergy and\nfamiliarity with bank routing numbers improves the situation, or\nnot...\n\n\nOn Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Roy Badami \u003croy at gnomon.org.uk\u003e wrote:\n\u003e On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:44:17PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:\n\u003e\u003e \"static address\" seems like a reasonable attempt at describing intended\n\u003e\u003e use/direction.\n\u003e\n\u003e ...as opposed to an address configured by DHCP?\n\u003e\n\u003e More seriously, I don't think a typical user will understand anything from\n\u003e the phrase \"static address\". But it is a neutral name, and it is shorter\n\u003e than \"address-of-a-type-for-which-reuse-is-not-deprecated\". :-)\n\u003e\n\u003e -roy\n\n\n\n-- \nJeff Garzik\nBitcoin core developer and open source evangelist\nBitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/",
"sig": "afee11f182c663f761c54219237eaac9eb050b03d7dfeb620ed3df0dcf2bf99284e1efa2eb5eef68f74763449520abbc74c21c90f3edc9a5b6b1e3150a6dd7d8"
}