š
Original date posted:2013-03-13
š Original message:On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 03:26:14PM +0000, Luke-Jr wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 3:18:36 PM Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> > > If we're going to consider doing this, at minimum we need to also
> >
> > I beg people to not derail discussion about fixing things with
> > discussion of other controversial changes.
>
> I figured 2 MB in 2-3 years was fairly uncontroversial.
> If not, let's scrap that idea for now.
The very statement that we're willing to increase the blocksize as our
solution to increased transaction volume rather go down the path of
off-chain transactions is incredibly controversial.
Fuck it, I'll make this public: I've had at least one person who went to
the trouble of finding my personal phone number just so they could leave
a few text messages saying I was going to do serious harm to Bitcoin. At
the same time I've also had a few people asking questions along the line
of had started and/or was considering starting a formal group opposing
the blocksize increase. I even got a significant anonymous donation a
few weeks ago. (rather fittingly this was done by emailing me an
easywallet URL from a throwaway account)
It's not just forum trolls who care about the issue, even if they make
the most noise about it.
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130313/b5539f99/attachment.sig>;
Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m2ā¦a2np2
2023-06-07 11:38:29
in reply to nevent1qā¦8xrt
Author Public Key
npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2Published at
2023-06-07 11:38:29Event JSON
{
"id": "e0ab3843686f6a66c4c65527616c5ca2ea117c67b80ccd6c7b9fb15445ddd6a2",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686137909,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"02fd249c82d4dd10181a617a5dadf9d8b2d27a405e04f833fafa551fe0bc94b8",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"9ad57ad082b71e355e7a710c4a5b9f488297d366154fb596c794fff47a367396",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"6ac6a519b554d8ff726a301e3daec0b489f443793778feccc6ea7a536f7354f1"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2013-03-13\nš Original message:On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 03:26:14PM +0000, Luke-Jr wrote:\n\u003e On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 3:18:36 PM Gregory Maxwell wrote:\n\u003e \u003e On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Peter Todd \u003cpete at petertodd.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e \u003e If we're going to consider doing this, at minimum we need to also\n\u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e I beg people to not derail discussion about fixing things with\n\u003e \u003e discussion of other controversial changes.\n\u003e \n\u003e I figured 2 MB in 2-3 years was fairly uncontroversial.\n\u003e If not, let's scrap that idea for now.\n\nThe very statement that we're willing to increase the blocksize as our\nsolution to increased transaction volume rather go down the path of\noff-chain transactions is incredibly controversial.\n\nFuck it, I'll make this public: I've had at least one person who went to\nthe trouble of finding my personal phone number just so they could leave\na few text messages saying I was going to do serious harm to Bitcoin. At\nthe same time I've also had a few people asking questions along the line\nof had started and/or was considering starting a formal group opposing\nthe blocksize increase. I even got a significant anonymous donation a\nfew weeks ago. (rather fittingly this was done by emailing me an\neasywallet URL from a throwaway account)\n\nIt's not just forum trolls who care about the issue, even if they make\nthe most noise about it.\n\n-- \n'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 198 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130313/b5539f99/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "4a5cd72ec9242af105cadcca37f014d435675c9f68aa8e7d0d794e9304eeb9fcd79f4ce57fc18d0d79fe80b0521461ae4a1ee967073c533b39836e2ab5099bd1"
}