📅 Original date posted:2017-01-07
📝 Original message:Can you guys please take this discussion elsewhere? Perhaps to
bitcoin-discuss? This is not the place to rehash discussions that have
taken place a million times already. The behavior of the network under
contentious hard forks has been discussed ad nauseum. This mailing list is
for the discussion of new ideas and proposals.
Much appreciated. Thanks.
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On 01/07/2017 03:10 PM, Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > Still wondering why you guys don't care about the ridiculous number of
> > full nodes, no incentive to run one and what would happen if someone
> > were to control a majority of full nodes
>
> The level of control over a majority of full nodes is irrelevant. If
> this was truly a measure of control over Bitcoin someone would simply
> spin up a bunch of nodes and take control at trivial cost.
>
> e
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170107/f5a91a61/attachment.html>;
Eric Lombrozo [ARCHIVE] /
npub1az…t2krq
2023-06-07 17:55:25
in reply to nevent1q…mdmd
Author Public Key
npub1azvhdrf9fu6n0tm7yez4j6zcxcedp2ct6nrcq3z74naqs7kgpk8s5t2krqPublished at
2023-06-07 17:55:25Event JSON
{
"id": "e9cf8e9b124dd5053b1983d351ef5cefd5371f2d9932bf3de650dc28194e4247",
"pubkey": "e899768d254f3537af7e26455968583632d0ab0bd4c780445eacfa087ac80d8f",
"created_at": 1686160525,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d5f8496f86fd93c533c201c13d7f12c0c533c51f028c09ba9b8d44db177e4b68",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"ba78c5866dc1836508a5e7e31246faca459f2728143ccd1bdb3c4271ada8b824",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"82205f272f995d9be742779a3c19a2ae08522ca14824c3a3b01525fb5459161e"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-01-07\n📝 Original message:Can you guys please take this discussion elsewhere? Perhaps to\nbitcoin-discuss? This is not the place to rehash discussions that have\ntaken place a million times already. The behavior of the network under\ncontentious hard forks has been discussed ad nauseum. This mailing list is\nfor the discussion of new ideas and proposals.\n\nMuch appreciated. Thanks.\n\nOn Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On 01/07/2017 03:10 PM, Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Still wondering why you guys don't care about the ridiculous number of\n\u003e \u003e full nodes, no incentive to run one and what would happen if someone\n\u003e \u003e were to control a majority of full nodes\n\u003e\n\u003e The level of control over a majority of full nodes is irrelevant. If\n\u003e this was truly a measure of control over Bitcoin someone would simply\n\u003e spin up a bunch of nodes and take control at trivial cost.\n\u003e\n\u003e e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170107/f5a91a61/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "ecff20f598c1ca57a9f16ce8fc623d2bfcb4f83f9ad745925358fd7f6bd27fbde9476279cec7b16774a4c1126571bd4218100267e1302ca4dcccdcdfc362c6f3"
}