Ann Lipton on Nostr: I want to point out that Justice de Moraes is treating SpaceX assets as ...
I want to point out that Justice de Moraes is treating SpaceX assets as indistinguishable from Twitter assets. If this were America you'd have to jump through hoops to draw that conclusion and you probably couldn't in the end. But it seems ... broadly correct.
(adds hypo to veil piercing/enterprise liability section of syllabus)
(we can also talk about why it's an appearance problem, if not a technical one, that Reed O'Connor's Tesla stock doesn't disqualify him from adjudicating X matters)
Published at
2024-08-30 21:28:31Event JSON
{
"id": "e9fce9c6190e3a107317c6e3316b6834e24368f611245d5dec3b23158e8fcb3e",
"pubkey": "9e9df3483381f796e971c4ede9cfa4c409c0bf8ea9e675bc955ef6ce73549a39",
"created_at": 1725053311,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://esq.social/users/annmlipton/statuses/113053093791819873",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "I want to point out that Justice de Moraes is treating SpaceX assets as indistinguishable from Twitter assets. If this were America you'd have to jump through hoops to draw that conclusion and you probably couldn't in the end. But it seems ... broadly correct.\n\n(adds hypo to veil piercing/enterprise liability section of syllabus)\n\n(we can also talk about why it's an appearance problem, if not a technical one, that Reed O'Connor's Tesla stock doesn't disqualify him from adjudicating X matters)",
"sig": "a607082f9b030437c1d877d93b17776d56cde0f5843d5aa3dcd2653c436f7249bbf6c64c512c4b84fcd7e8722a75b89405b60682def85f795ca097f3da8180df"
}