📅 Original date posted:2014-04-24
📝 Original message:On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Warren Togami Jr. <wtogami at gmail.com> wrote:
> I now see how it worked with Bitcoin 0.8.6. Lucid has qt-4.6.2.
>
> It is more than one symbol. It does not seem to be a wise thing to replace
> functions beyond the trivial in glibc and libstdc++.
Qt is not part of the compiler/build environment. Thus we don't need
to resort to those kind of tricks.
As I said: we can easily build against Qt 4.6 instead. As said, that
wouldn't even need building Qt on linux, just unpacking and exporting
the headers.
But indeed we need to decide on a cut-off point. I'd have preferred
4.7 or 4.8. Qt 4.6 is *ancient* - it was released in februari 2010.
Apart from tails it doesn't seem like anyone is using those old stable
distributions on the desktop.
Wladimir
Wladimir [ARCHIVE] /
npub1xq…ymc2p
2023-06-07 15:19:20
in reply to nevent1q…wyuh
Author Public Key
npub1xqshkqv2g7uea4xzqwvmgjcz7u8vfavw6aazs999v0azsv3w7u3qpymc2pSeen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 15:19:20Event JSON
{
"id": "edf782901dab06ef6f54fe7c05296512274fa80b14edc1ae64b8546d66586053",
"pubkey": "30217b018a47b99ed4c20399b44b02f70ec4f58ed77a2814a563fa28322ef722",
"created_at": 1686151160,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"32a9c22b7e6c52f4ef70051f92bdc18644b13f1c93ed2a5c2cefd9e927d70b7e",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"6aa3c3db9b747e67e3d9e60223ba6cf40c83e717c89c13d4da60ffc5abe1f045",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"8502a34ff455a038f6a04f4e3cd053dcbb5d711b89a3d211e65615b00e0ed65d"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-04-24\n📝 Original message:On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Warren Togami Jr. \u003cwtogami at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e I now see how it worked with Bitcoin 0.8.6. Lucid has qt-4.6.2.\n\u003e\n\u003e It is more than one symbol. It does not seem to be a wise thing to replace\n\u003e functions beyond the trivial in glibc and libstdc++.\n\nQt is not part of the compiler/build environment. Thus we don't need\nto resort to those kind of tricks.\n\nAs I said: we can easily build against Qt 4.6 instead. As said, that\nwouldn't even need building Qt on linux, just unpacking and exporting\nthe headers.\n\nBut indeed we need to decide on a cut-off point. I'd have preferred\n4.7 or 4.8. Qt 4.6 is *ancient* - it was released in februari 2010.\nApart from tails it doesn't seem like anyone is using those old stable\ndistributions on the desktop.\n\nWladimir",
"sig": "351009bc0b39ca83f72ae3418adb35738bd1e6f87383143841b1d23156c872b761112a7fcbefaf04d98fc59df63459bb2f092fa382e88125a9b8c37e32903189"
}