Luke-Jr [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2012-01-27 📝 Original message:On Friday, January 27, ...
📅 Original date posted:2012-01-27
📝 Original message:On Friday, January 27, 2012 7:36:31 PM bitcoin-list at bluematt.me wrote:
> It was implemented in the waylaying client with the merge of Bitcoin-Qt for
> drag and drop, and just recently for system URI handling in
>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/70f55355e29c8e45b607e782c5d76609> d23cc858.
It's been implemented in many clients for nearly all 2011.
Bitcoin-Qt is just behind the pace. Not relevant.
> However the version on the wiki armed as BIP 20 has a ton of extraneous crap
> in it's number encoding which is not implemented in Bitcoin-Qt since it was
> explicitly voted against at the time the spec was being discussed.
You mean 3 months *after* the spec had a consensus and multiple
implementations.
Published at
2023-06-07 02:58:09Event JSON
{
"id": "edab44f816b6d7b577fe066f03298d017f36b6bc8792d4615f864b6a5eb33268",
"pubkey": "6ac6a519b554d8ff726a301e3daec0b489f443793778feccc6ea7a536f7354f1",
"created_at": 1686106689,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"a4614635249a75314c633ce7d96581def5705a9e367e9b2ab4d190f473eb51bf",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"625d86a8c80d58e230429e859c7f789439b8df2f89222eeabce7f9eaf39d0efc",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f577af168a67be97656b0e7e710ae3f490a57df3bbc6a5597dff3274bcf4abe1"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2012-01-27\n📝 Original message:On Friday, January 27, 2012 7:36:31 PM bitcoin-list at bluematt.me wrote:\n\u003e It was implemented in the waylaying client with the merge of Bitcoin-Qt for\n\u003e drag and drop, and just recently for system URI handling in\n\u003e https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/70f55355e29c8e45b607e782c5d76609\n\u003e d23cc858.\n\nIt's been implemented in many clients for nearly all 2011.\nBitcoin-Qt is just behind the pace. Not relevant.\n\n\u003e However the version on the wiki armed as BIP 20 has a ton of extraneous crap\n\u003e in it's number encoding which is not implemented in Bitcoin-Qt since it was\n\u003e explicitly voted against at the time the spec was being discussed.\n\nYou mean 3 months *after* the spec had a consensus and multiple \nimplementations.",
"sig": "56ef873ef21c05aafabc16728e1be66989dc91dae1724dc8c3bfcd0303e4dc2b05dc065f47adc627c92e9148b48ef0140bf2dae57e0d7672f770031986409dbe"
}