📅 Original date posted:2018-01-08
📝 Original message:On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 01:39:20PM +0100, Pavol Rusnak via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > The construction also
> > will silently result in the user getting a different private key if
> > they enter the wrong passphrase-- which could lead to funds loss.
>
> Again, this is by design and it is main point why plausible deniability
> is achieved both in BIP39 and SLIP39. If we used a different
> construction we'd loose plausible deniability.
Can you explain _exactly_ what scenario the "plausible deniability" feature
refers to?
--
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180108/a83273e6/attachment.sig>;
Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m2…a2np2
2023-06-07 18:09:26
in reply to nevent1q…zdes
Author Public Key
npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2Published at
2023-06-07 18:09:26Event JSON
{
"id": "ef8003d43381a77e7f789ef7013cb7f9144899b05cd20767d2fe7b2aea6be99b",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686161366,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"ac3c87f148ca764c85262d935c0d26818cde51a790aa045223a08240c1ff8e91",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"dc1510919d7fdef9483f34c92aa459a77c8c74267bafea78c9e897e4500851ca",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"7631397e469f47f3535567311f5f7c17129e0ff2cb253df015e3d92ddfd92c63"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2018-01-08\n📝 Original message:On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 01:39:20PM +0100, Pavol Rusnak via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e \u003e The construction also\n\u003e \u003e will silently result in the user getting a different private key if\n\u003e \u003e they enter the wrong passphrase-- which could lead to funds loss.\n\u003e \n\u003e Again, this is by design and it is main point why plausible deniability\n\u003e is achieved both in BIP39 and SLIP39. If we used a different\n\u003e construction we'd loose plausible deniability.\n\nCan you explain _exactly_ what scenario the \"plausible deniability\" feature\nrefers to?\n\n-- \nhttps://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 455 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180108/a83273e6/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "b0145891b8133dea098e665a3e329b7dc3ea6ad2dc310f994c3fe5861de209671360c0c65ab91c1aeebf4ea12bea30f6076259350b0e21894745c3576994b6be"
}