Anon on Nostr: Agree 💯. The counterargument always seems to be that people’s consumption will ...
Agree 💯. The counterargument always seems to be that people’s consumption will plummet. But so what? Is that a bad thing? Isn’t that exactly what the eco-virtue signalers say they want? All their posturing about lowering consumption to save the planet is BS. They *need* inflationary fiat theft to fund their welfare schemes. At the end of the day, they value the handouts that fiat debasement provides rather than the massive reduction in consumption, CO3 emissions, etc. that deflation would enable.
Published at
2025-05-23 19:41:01Event JSON
{
"id": "eb31085996939a814d0213539db2046765d11e946c1a2a9dd4a3adc21debd217",
"pubkey": "b5424c8ecb75bb282679cd0d5cb09a879153e61753bbe929a7a64ca45c3cd534",
"created_at": 1748029261,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c83c09c76dc0a06100a7d4d3e15d333c4ab4f0f3d6ca23a34548d003678dd332",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"b9e76546ba06456ed301d9e52bc49fa48e70a6bf2282be7a1ae72947612023dc"
]
],
"content": "Agree 💯. The counterargument always seems to be that people’s consumption will plummet. But so what? Is that a bad thing? Isn’t that exactly what the eco-virtue signalers say they want? All their posturing about lowering consumption to save the planet is BS. They *need* inflationary fiat theft to fund their welfare schemes. At the end of the day, they value the handouts that fiat debasement provides rather than the massive reduction in consumption, CO3 emissions, etc. that deflation would enable.",
"sig": "6a880c663831a606956df9a35d8ba94c5c7b3555eb7d90c22528ca1a90d9725cb50e20a1d5426fb7fe18716b8f3969206a88a92acc6e78346933e238119017f0"
}
