Today the FT argues there is little difference in economic strategy between Rachel Reeves & Jeremy Hunt (as it happens echoing much commentary here).
Leaving aside the facts of the matter, this looks to me like the FT coming out for Labour & seeking to reassure its readers that Labour can offer 'economic stability' to complement the offer of political stability in contrast to the chaotic recent years of Tory govt.
Labour will happily take this as an endorsement!
Others, will be worried!
Emeritus Prof Christopher May /
npub1hr…f2ktj
2024-05-08 05:02:16
Author Public Key
npub1hr0x0gm9ksmvuvqwkyzfjuczv9pln83axuftxfhnq2maday69ypqtf2ktjPublished at
2024-05-08 05:02:16Event JSON
{
"id": "eb742cc74ef23959ab06217d2e0fc14a41949c2592bc131699066342b95344ed",
"pubkey": "b8de67a365b436ce300eb1049973026143f99e3d3712b326f302b7d6f49a2902",
"created_at": 1715144536,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://zirk.us/users/ChrisMayLA6/statuses/112403712335435977",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "Today the FT argues there is little difference in economic strategy between Rachel Reeves \u0026 Jeremy Hunt (as it happens echoing much commentary here).\n\nLeaving aside the facts of the matter, this looks to me like the FT coming out for Labour \u0026 seeking to reassure its readers that Labour can offer 'economic stability' to complement the offer of political stability in contrast to the chaotic recent years of Tory govt.\n\nLabour will happily take this as an endorsement!\n\nOthers, will be worried!",
"sig": "549ce52e3d533f0f91968bd15d1d6393d85e45864f0a674283c4380909e8052a5a9c3558774f2d7531593d426ad61cd1ebec76ed044483bc4ea79c4b56ffb367"
}