Morning all. Quite a day yesterday, and today so far. I’m obviously taking a beating from everyone who thinks the Bluesky bridge should be opt in. OK.
I want to run one idea by you all. The way the bridge is currently designed, no fediverse profiles or other content are proactively bridged into Bluesky. If someone on Bluesky wants to see or follow someone on the fediverse, they have to manually request it on the bridge. That fediverse user’s posts are then only bridged going forward, and only if someone follows them.
What if, the first time someone on Bluesky requests to follow someone on the fediverse via the bridge, the fediverse user gets prompted, “X from Bluesky wants to follow you. Are you ok with connecting with Bluesky?”, maybe via DM. I assume that would still be considered opt in?
Realistically, most people in the fediverse will never hear about the bridge. Traditional opt in and opt out both generally expect people to proactively find a setting or take some action, often one that only a tiny fraction of people ever learn about. I don’t really care how many people discover or use the bridge, but this kind of just-in-time prompt, only shown when someone wants to follow or interact with them, feels like a useful improvement in that it puts the decision in front of them directly.
Thanks to @kio for the idea. It seems promising; I’m now planning to try it out well before launch. Let me know if you don’t like it.
Ryan Barrett /
npub192…xegjh
2024-02-13 17:29:45
Author Public Key
npub192zgfvxl3xukuwld7fcd3l88un9rxxynsxd4fay4pj3x9cgxrh2qvxegjhPublished at
2024-02-13 17:29:45Event JSON
{
"id": "ebdb12c54c2f3e7fb0db94c70b5a41143b1877056b2951eea081c00da6c29f7e",
"pubkey": "2a8484b0df89b96e3bedf270d8fce7e4ca331893819b54f4950ca262e1061dd4",
"created_at": 1707845385,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"3633d7568ef37b1c23c855975c6edf5344badddee91a52b96869df0abfe5b6ec",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://snarfed.org/2024-02-13_52223",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "Morning all. Quite a day yesterday, and today so far. I’m obviously taking a beating from everyone who thinks the Bluesky bridge should be opt in. OK.\nI want to run one idea by you all. The way the bridge is currently designed, no fediverse profiles or other content are proactively bridged into Bluesky. If someone on Bluesky wants to see or follow someone on the fediverse, they have to manually request it on the bridge. That fediverse user’s posts are then only bridged going forward, and only if someone follows them.\nWhat if, the first time someone on Bluesky requests to follow someone on the fediverse via the bridge, the fediverse user gets prompted, “X from Bluesky wants to follow you. Are you ok with connecting with Bluesky?”, maybe via DM. I assume that would still be considered opt in?\nRealistically, most people in the fediverse will never hear about the bridge. Traditional opt in and opt out both generally expect people to proactively find a setting or take some action, often one that only a tiny fraction of people ever learn about. I don’t really care how many people discover or use the bridge, but this kind of just-in-time prompt, only shown when someone wants to follow or interact with them, feels like a useful improvement in that it puts the decision in front of them directly.\nThanks to @kio for the idea. It seems promising; I’m now planning to try it out well before launch. Let me know if you don’t like it.",
"sig": "2a147fa9aa9a3264650f3c369eebccebdbf70f07d4360f708798817b85cb0a753d40451c970286da1e4b2d09db2cbdb29de3edb8ea47ecfb9ddef04bd783ba2d"
}