Event JSON
{
"id": "e4321f6f481176d159b231c6903febf2544fb0c52ba4ade0e5fc295bbf14db0c",
"pubkey": "f8bb95387db659f0ecbfabdf9e83f03c7ad471a31dfbf6283bf09186d776b4db",
"created_at": 1705096407,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"91432d0ad8712118d596a743a22aaeaff40c4858b5df69948863bda455488ca2",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"85c220e6add040d8bb71a25235f7d631d82c5356bcd4c0578b393c17b870d4e7",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"fe7791e85c00f674998a0194f68ffb1da67d160dbd59b51f4cac6276d8fbdb0b",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.lawprofs.org/users/lpramsey/statuses/111745198182073674",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1j9pj6zkcwys334vk5ap6y24w4l6qcjzckh0kn9ygvw76g42g3j3qfk6kez I think there is a significant difference between use of a word or design to refer to a trademark owner like Jack Daniel’s, and use of a term for its dictionary or other meaning unrelated to the trademark owner (eg empire or punchbowl). Such latter uses are still expressive and/or informational speech protected by the First Amendment.",
"sig": "47f9f78880e807f6450d571d898dfb59a71f77348586a6c6a7319cfc44857bc3b3915d8bc8bd52fdc46f5b3feb1b914c16a54b9fb837de834c6f335af4b4d383"
}