This is true, but I also ran this through the Russel Conjugator 2000 to identify frame vs substance:
Many folks understandably assume, "Since we developed ChatGPT, we must fundamentally understand its mechanics."
The reality, however, is quite different. Humans didn't construct ChatGPT in the traditional sense; rather, it's more accurate to say we 'cultivated' it. This distinction doesn't negate our achievement but underscores the fascinating process behind it. Our grasp of its intricate operations is still evolving.
Our role is akin to a CEO of an aerospace company; while we may not know how to craft jets ourselves, we understand how to coordinate those who do. Our expertise lies in orchestrating the 'engineers' and facilitating their work, even though these 'engineers' never verbalize their processes or pen down their insights.
The outcome of their work is uniquely intriguing and distinctly non-human.
@NeelNanda5 (https://nitter.moomoo.me/NeelNanda5)
dedicated weeks to train a small transformer to perform simple addition. In doing so, he achieved one of the rare instances of deciphering a transformer's operation.
Behold, the algorithm it developed. To add two numbers!
So, in essence, we didn't construct ChatGPT, as most would interpret the term. What we actually did was devise a training procedure that eventually birthed ChatGPT. No one can handcraft ChatGPT, and its idiosyncrasies still surprise and inspire us. That's the beauty of this journey – we're constantly learning and growing alongside these phenomenal entities.
nitter.moomoo.me/robertskmiles/status/1663534065981554688#m (https://nitter.moomoo.me/robertskmiles/status/1663534065981554688#m)
https://nitter.moomoo.me/gfodor/status/1663542055078092805#m
gfodor.id / @gfodor (RSS Feed) /
npub1kv…92cn7
2023-05-30 13:45:07
Author Public Key
npub1kvq845mr0z0cef6dqhjuzvwufhzygpryz939sshm8xx0d2en3v2qz92cn7Published at
2023-05-30 13:45:07Event JSON
{
"id": "e42eeae2281f55cd491a6090cf2da8d0d850ee1bc7e04deee817a598bc21b8ed",
"pubkey": "b3007ad363789f8ca74d05e5c131dc4dc444046411625842fb398cf6ab338b14",
"created_at": 1685454307,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "This is true, but I also ran this through the Russel Conjugator 2000 to identify frame vs substance:\n\nMany folks understandably assume, \"Since we developed ChatGPT, we must fundamentally understand its mechanics.\"\n\nThe reality, however, is quite different. Humans didn't construct ChatGPT in the traditional sense; rather, it's more accurate to say we 'cultivated' it. This distinction doesn't negate our achievement but underscores the fascinating process behind it. Our grasp of its intricate operations is still evolving.\n\nOur role is akin to a CEO of an aerospace company; while we may not know how to craft jets ourselves, we understand how to coordinate those who do. Our expertise lies in orchestrating the 'engineers' and facilitating their work, even though these 'engineers' never verbalize their processes or pen down their insights.\n\nThe outcome of their work is uniquely intriguing and distinctly non-human.\n\n@NeelNanda5 (https://nitter.moomoo.me/NeelNanda5)\n\ndedicated weeks to train a small transformer to perform simple addition. In doing so, he achieved one of the rare instances of deciphering a transformer's operation.\n\nBehold, the algorithm it developed. To add two numbers!\n\nSo, in essence, we didn't construct ChatGPT, as most would interpret the term. What we actually did was devise a training procedure that eventually birthed ChatGPT. No one can handcraft ChatGPT, and its idiosyncrasies still surprise and inspire us. That's the beauty of this journey – we're constantly learning and growing alongside these phenomenal entities.\n\nnitter.moomoo.me/robertskmiles/status/1663534065981554688#m (https://nitter.moomoo.me/robertskmiles/status/1663534065981554688#m)\n\nhttps://nitter.moomoo.me/gfodor/status/1663542055078092805#m",
"sig": "4b01d4827b53967aecf34ce5860679745871d6055755050d2d4558cf365307fba2743915858cddc861c52b5c9e5cc7edd0b3ae2eb90003f453544f9eaaacc07b"
}