Bram on Nostr: The screenshot in yesterday's toot on #fastgpt displays the question: what makes it ...
The screenshot in yesterday's toot on #fastgpt displays the question: what makes it better than ChatGPT?
The funny thing is it missed out on two major aspects:
1. The model is open source:
https://github.com/labring/FastGPT/2. Also I like the fact more that Kagi provides the search results on which the answer was based. This gives more transparency than ChatGPT does.
Downside: it's not really a chat, it answers one question at a time without followup. But that is being worked on, apparently.
If you're curious, you can see for yourself at
https://kagi.com/fastgpt.
https://emacs.ch/@bram85/111620681768693603Published at
2023-12-22 09:04:00Event JSON
{
"id": "e47d74dc72757bf712d1ad01830408429d1e263b6ef17dd7edb2d467f8ef7566",
"pubkey": "8d3d633d0312f3dd5e7c64a2633ac3f6cf294604e3da0b4054e4469ad483eaec",
"created_at": 1703235840,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"fastgpt"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://emacs.ch/users/bram85/statuses/111623264047652256",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "The screenshot in yesterday's toot on #fastgpt displays the question: what makes it better than ChatGPT?\n\nThe funny thing is it missed out on two major aspects:\n\n1. The model is open source:\n\nhttps://github.com/labring/FastGPT/\n\n2. Also I like the fact more that Kagi provides the search results on which the answer was based. This gives more transparency than ChatGPT does.\n\nDownside: it's not really a chat, it answers one question at a time without followup. But that is being worked on, apparently.\n\nIf you're curious, you can see for yourself at https://kagi.com/fastgpt.\n\nhttps://emacs.ch/@bram85/111620681768693603",
"sig": "24309510d6dabb4ad7bda540e4f21c30a4adf672af5591c2e22dd7d6243ab14df85709c836d28eae42636bd332b979555a44b74acbeb9da4d923a4ceb6ee2053"
}