📅 Original date posted:2021-03-12
📝 Original message:Can I just point out (to those addressing James as Lord/Excelency/etc
that he isn't noble nor a Lord, so just wanted to mention this in case
people were giving him more attention than the average person would be
afforded.
My 2p (an equal 2p) on Taproot is ACK, by the way.
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 00:49, Keagan McClelland via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> LORD HIS EXCELLENCY,
>
> This isn't different with Taproot either. When you spend a P2SH output you reveal the script. In Taproot you reveal the portion of the script that is relevant to allowing you to spend it. There is no value to specifying the other possible conditions that could have moved the coins because, after all, you aren't invoking those clauses to move the coins. I am showing you my fingertip, and pointing to my finger tip, the palm is not relevant.
>
> Keagan
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 2:11 AM LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> Good Afternoon,
>>
>> You cannot liken the ability to scrutinise the public ledger to be the same as hiding information, it is like showing your palm while you are pointing at the back of your hand. The advice that I have is P2SH is scrutable once the UTXO is spent. Also, there is no public ledger obfuscation in creating new addresses, there is a plausible reduction in transaction linkage.
>>
>> KING JAMES HRMH
>> Great British Empire
>>
>> Regards,
>> The Australian
>> LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH (& HMRH)
>> of Hougun Manor & Glencoe & British Empire
>> MR. Damian A. James Williamson
>> Wills
>>
>> et al.
>>
>>
>> Willtech
>> www.willtech.com.au
>> www.go-overt.com
>> and other projects
>>
>> earn.com/willtech
>> linkedin.com/in/damianwilliamson
>>
>>
>> m. 0487135719
>> f. +61261470192
>>
>>
>> This email does not constitute a general advice. Please disregard this email if misdelivered.
>> ________________________________
>> From: bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev-bounces at lists.linuxfoundation.org> on behalf of Ryan Grant via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, 6 March 2021 1:04 AM
>> To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
>> Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot NACK
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 8:48 PM LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via
>> bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > My concern was that the more complex scripts allow obfuscation of the Pay To address
>>
>> This is no different from options available in P2SH, or from the
>> obfuscation achieved by generating a new address for a payment.
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
R E Broadley [ARCHIVE] /
npub12v…sppw8
2023-06-07 18:29:29
in reply to nevent1q…zeyk
Author Public Key
npub12vzx6za9u8xhn6em7mq6msart7e42u2954mt3kzc7z7p0ux6f3lsxsppw8Seen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 18:29:29Event JSON
{
"id": "ecf17f67feae9f03459ab6a29f415fcc993c9c8885696ef41c8a64e7393d9eeb",
"pubkey": "53046d0ba5e1cd79eb3bf6c1adc3a35fb3557145a576b8d858f0bc17f0da4c7f",
"created_at": 1686162569,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"fbe18195666f4999749fdf6993d80c23f172359c2ba9321ca7af2f86382284a4",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"c633b08a609857fdf586ff998f18e62ee8e6593772929416ad95f987ea3dc52d",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4aa66c838f2cc55afbd46335fb2520507e2030601f773b28b96b76ec60a2f489"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2021-03-12\n📝 Original message:Can I just point out (to those addressing James as Lord/Excelency/etc\nthat he isn't noble nor a Lord, so just wanted to mention this in case\npeople were giving him more attention than the average person would be\nafforded.\n\nMy 2p (an equal 2p) on Taproot is ACK, by the way.\n\nOn Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 00:49, Keagan McClelland via bitcoin-dev\n\u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e LORD HIS EXCELLENCY,\n\u003e\n\u003e This isn't different with Taproot either. When you spend a P2SH output you reveal the script. In Taproot you reveal the portion of the script that is relevant to allowing you to spend it. There is no value to specifying the other possible conditions that could have moved the coins because, after all, you aren't invoking those clauses to move the coins. I am showing you my fingertip, and pointing to my finger tip, the palm is not relevant.\n\u003e\n\u003e Keagan\n\u003e\n\u003e On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 2:11 AM LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Good Afternoon,\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e You cannot liken the ability to scrutinise the public ledger to be the same as hiding information, it is like showing your palm while you are pointing at the back of your hand. The advice that I have is P2SH is scrutable once the UTXO is spent. Also, there is no public ledger obfuscation in creating new addresses, there is a plausible reduction in transaction linkage.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e KING JAMES HRMH\n\u003e\u003e Great British Empire\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Regards,\n\u003e\u003e The Australian\n\u003e\u003e LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH (\u0026 HMRH)\n\u003e\u003e of Hougun Manor \u0026 Glencoe \u0026 British Empire\n\u003e\u003e MR. Damian A. James Williamson\n\u003e\u003e Wills\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e et al.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Willtech\n\u003e\u003e www.willtech.com.au\n\u003e\u003e www.go-overt.com\n\u003e\u003e and other projects\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e earn.com/willtech\n\u003e\u003e linkedin.com/in/damianwilliamson\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e m. 0487135719\n\u003e\u003e f. +61261470192\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e This email does not constitute a general advice. Please disregard this email if misdelivered.\n\u003e\u003e ________________________________\n\u003e\u003e From: bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev-bounces at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e on behalf of Ryan Grant via bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Sent: Saturday, 6 March 2021 1:04 AM\n\u003e\u003e To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot NACK\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 8:48 PM LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via\n\u003e\u003e bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e \u003e My concern was that the more complex scripts allow obfuscation of the Pay To address\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e This is no different from options available in P2SH, or from the\n\u003e\u003e obfuscation achieved by generating a new address for a payment.\n\u003e\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev",
"sig": "99a567f35dc09b80fa47cd71d796c9b08ca76be59a784f6e2b431900d09372943cd0381cdd96d92c24e5431fbb889bd3e40d1d4da993f7db5da4fff322693570"
}