M. Dilger on Nostr: So Western-backed Ukraine is low on soldiers, but it's not low on funding. The West ...
So Western-backed Ukraine is low on soldiers, but it's not low on funding. The West could out-spend Russia and win in a very long war of financial attrition. But could it happen without non-Ukrainian soldiers coming in to backfill? This is what I was pondering when I thought about AI and robotics. I think we are near the tipping point where the West could provide a fully robotic army to continue fighting for Ukraine. And in that situation the strategy and calculus flips and Ukraine becomes the 'favorite' to win. I'm I too far out in speculation left field on this, or is this quite possible? Thoughts?
Published at
2024-06-02 05:10:29Event JSON
{
"id": "ec8e81ce7f789b924cb10e20437c41cc09b7c999c04adcd35c1ad5b32ba56baa",
"pubkey": "ee11a5dff40c19a555f41fe42b48f00e618c91225622ae37b6c2bb67b76c4e49",
"created_at": 1717305029,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "So Western-backed Ukraine is low on soldiers, but it's not low on funding. The West could out-spend Russia and win in a very long war of financial attrition. But could it happen without non-Ukrainian soldiers coming in to backfill? This is what I was pondering when I thought about AI and robotics. I think we are near the tipping point where the West could provide a fully robotic army to continue fighting for Ukraine. And in that situation the strategy and calculus flips and Ukraine becomes the 'favorite' to win. I'm I too far out in speculation left field on this, or is this quite possible? Thoughts?",
"sig": "66795cd7f0cbc045d2100091821183d0a55330a883a5b9bc1f7a95efced999dcfae08de132bc4112c2f8592821c3ac68640b776dec6b8a2d7e647588c88a6f65"
}
