📅 Original date posted:2015-07-29
📝 Original message:
I should have posted this to the whole group. Sorry, hit the wrong button.
:p
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Eric Lombrozo" <elombrozo at gmail.com>
Date: Jul 29, 2015 3:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Lightning-dev] OP_CHECKSPVPROOFVERIFY
To: "Joseph Poon" <joseph at lightning.network>
Cc:
Joseph,
The point isn't better security than current SPV proofs. That would require
improvements to the commitment structures.
The point is to allow outsourceability of SPV proofs over LN. We would want
to avoid actually using OP_CHECKSPVPROOFVERIFY in the blockchain...but it
would allow crafting a contract requesting payment from the SPV client
along with an enforcement mechanism in the event the client fails to pay.
- Eric
On Jul 29, 2015 12:54 PM, "Joseph Poon" <joseph at lightning.network> wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:08:39AM -0700, Eric Lombrozo wrote:
> > It occurs to me that with the LN, it might be practical to outsource
> > SPV proofs from other nodes.
>
> I couldn't find anything on an SPV proof opcode, what kind of opcode are
> you thinking of or do you have any links? I tried looking it up but
> couldn't find anything about it. I'm curious on whether/how it could it
> offer significantly better security than current SPV proofs.
>
> --
> Joseph Poon
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20150729/4f04040a/attachment.html>;
Eric Lombrozo [ARCHIVE] /
npub1az…t2krq
2023-06-09 12:43:51
in reply to nevent1q…ccw5
Author Public Key
npub1azvhdrf9fu6n0tm7yez4j6zcxcedp2ct6nrcq3z74naqs7kgpk8s5t2krqPublished at
2023-06-09 12:43:51Event JSON
{
"id": "e6b0a29dd9be8cbfd566d17776197e889629ab7f1e73e5bac88df792651c66d9",
"pubkey": "e899768d254f3537af7e26455968583632d0ab0bd4c780445eacfa087ac80d8f",
"created_at": 1686314631,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"0f0615906f5126b95b75e16acc71f58ff9002300fbb6cb5542ce7975bbffcede",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"9456f7acb763eaab2e02bd8e60cf17df74f352c2ae579dce1f1dd25c95dd611c"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-07-29\n📝 Original message:\nI should have posted this to the whole group. Sorry, hit the wrong button.\n:p\n---------- Forwarded message ----------\nFrom: \"Eric Lombrozo\" \u003celombrozo at gmail.com\u003e\nDate: Jul 29, 2015 3:27 PM\nSubject: Re: [Lightning-dev] OP_CHECKSPVPROOFVERIFY\nTo: \"Joseph Poon\" \u003cjoseph at lightning.network\u003e\nCc:\n\nJoseph,\n\nThe point isn't better security than current SPV proofs. That would require\nimprovements to the commitment structures.\n\nThe point is to allow outsourceability of SPV proofs over LN. We would want\nto avoid actually using OP_CHECKSPVPROOFVERIFY in the blockchain...but it\nwould allow crafting a contract requesting payment from the SPV client\nalong with an enforcement mechanism in the event the client fails to pay.\n\n- Eric\nOn Jul 29, 2015 12:54 PM, \"Joseph Poon\" \u003cjoseph at lightning.network\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Hi Eric,\n\u003e\n\u003e On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:08:39AM -0700, Eric Lombrozo wrote:\n\u003e \u003e It occurs to me that with the LN, it might be practical to outsource\n\u003e \u003e SPV proofs from other nodes.\n\u003e\n\u003e I couldn't find anything on an SPV proof opcode, what kind of opcode are\n\u003e you thinking of or do you have any links? I tried looking it up but\n\u003e couldn't find anything about it. I'm curious on whether/how it could it\n\u003e offer significantly better security than current SPV proofs.\n\u003e\n\u003e --\n\u003e Joseph Poon\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20150729/4f04040a/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "29ea1d1cf1ec28500582fbb3fe07c0332b4fe910a8c2fd56d9870a77beba5cf913e9ef402b50ff55af71eaf95015d47e70c172dec480dc2b88e3aed7f3547ecf"
}