Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š
Original date posted:2016-04-01 š Original message:On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at ...
š
Original date posted:2016-04-01
š Original message:On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:41:40PM -0700, Timo Hanke via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'd like to announce a white paper that describes a very new and
> significant algorithmic improvement to the Bitcoin mining process which has
> never been discussed in public before. The white paper can be found here:
>
>
http://www.math.rwth-aachen.de/~Timo.Hanke/AsicBoostWhitepaperrev5.pdfWhat steps are you going to take to make sure that this improvement is
available to all ASIC designers/mfgs on a equal opportunity basis?
The fact that you've chosen to patent this improvement could be a
centralization concern depending on the licensing model used. For example, one
could imagine a licensing model that gave one manufacture exclusive rights.
--
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160401/62b71047/attachment.sig>
Published at
2023-06-07 17:50:03Event JSON
{
"id": "eeb2c2bebd917829e51c2d88f342f3ac9e9392c75f5ad56bdd52bc6188ca2af2",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686160203,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"795c5aad8a484a5ef712947a3dbff6f73056df3d20100cce60abef6b3a680ecb",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"63f0986a23c0b990450ac0967870375fac691ff521ce1fcdcc2a753d769eed67",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"6b41dfcce682764d40c00fd6580a99614b6bbe8a8332085dea07afbc47ba9e8f"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2016-04-01\nš Original message:On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:41:40PM -0700, Timo Hanke via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e Hi.\n\u003e \n\u003e I'd like to announce a white paper that describes a very new and\n\u003e significant algorithmic improvement to the Bitcoin mining process which has\n\u003e never been discussed in public before. The white paper can be found here:\n\u003e \n\u003e http://www.math.rwth-aachen.de/~Timo.Hanke/AsicBoostWhitepaperrev5.pdf\n\nWhat steps are you going to take to make sure that this improvement is\navailable to all ASIC designers/mfgs on a equal opportunity basis?\n\nThe fact that you've chosen to patent this improvement could be a\ncentralization concern depending on the licensing model used. For example, one\ncould imagine a licensing model that gave one manufacture exclusive rights.\n\n-- \nhttps://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 455 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160401/62b71047/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "5748221c55b5fe84f3e9bdfe0d68c3f702ad765ff3c9dd9ba983ac4c41358c92e7a01736f716fdd3b8894616fda3430cf59cb3401bb96a392713d4bd3c8b3705"
}