📅 Original date posted:2015-06-06
📝 Original message:On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 09:46:17PM -0700, Mark Friedenbach wrote:
> Rusty, this doesn't play well with SIGHASH_SINGLE which is used in
> assurance contracts among other things. Sometimes the ordering is set by
> the signing logic itself...
But in that case (unconstrained) randomization can't be used either. This is posed as an alternative to randomization. So in that regard, the proposal still makes sense.
I think this move to verifyable, deterministic methods where possible is good.
Wladimir
Wladimir J. van der Laan [ARCHIVE] /
npub1ts…rfl5y
2023-06-07 15:36:42
in reply to nevent1q…vqnw
Author Public Key
npub1ts9hljj3l4yrpdxelpqdup3l46lw40fmkhw3rr0feh6s5ml247vqerfl5yPublished at
2023-06-07 15:36:42Event JSON
{
"id": "ee8f1a6b93c290a810ecbfc5ead1141257fe9e27f4932f62c9a1eae355af32d4",
"pubkey": "5c0b7fca51fd4830b4d9f840de063faebeeabd3bb5dd118de9cdf50a6feaaf98",
"created_at": 1686152202,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"981f41da2a008fa33b1384e8dd3f0d4a96b7f3bed5c463f00f9032a495226e9c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"731369f26b11e9f002aa19120b960beae929753aee30683913f32b8b0bb875c3",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"13bd8c1c5e3b3508a07c92598647160b11ab0deef4c452098e223e443c1ca425"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-06-06\n📝 Original message:On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 09:46:17PM -0700, Mark Friedenbach wrote:\n\u003e Rusty, this doesn't play well with SIGHASH_SINGLE which is used in\n\u003e assurance contracts among other things. Sometimes the ordering is set by\n\u003e the signing logic itself...\n\nBut in that case (unconstrained) randomization can't be used either. This is posed as an alternative to randomization. So in that regard, the proposal still makes sense.\nI think this move to verifyable, deterministic methods where possible is good.\n\nWladimir",
"sig": "bf317a987af3ff3707c10280cccb249632ee11c5d1bd7980ae13adced7d2cdf3f98dea5e778778c614ae390c6091637e1a0a7b22ea64ce91413250519795c411"
}