đź“… Original date posted:2017-06-11
đź“ť Original message:Jorge TimĂłn wrote:
"My preference would be a bip149 proposal that could be merged and
released now, but some people complain that would require more
testing, because *if you deploy bip149 and then sw gets activated pre
nov15, then you want bip149 nodes to use the old service bit for
segwit*, not the new one (you would use that one if it activates post
nov15, so that pre-bip149 nodes don't get confused)."
(emphasis added)
Why not just make sure BIP 149 will never activate unless BIP 141 has
expired unsuccessfully? If BIP 141 should unexpectly activate, then
BIP 149 nodes would notice and act as pre-SegWit nodes indefinitely,
but remain in consensus with BIP 141 nodes.
It might be slightly less convenient for BIP 149 users to upgrade
again, but then at least we could start deploying BIP 149 sooner.
Martijn Meijering [ARCHIVE] /
npub1c8…gyspc
2023-06-07 18:03:05
in reply to nevent1q…zkry
Author Public Key
npub1c8a4kf5amu98zlm67ghm2zplcxatwvs97v8ngyv7ypmsw6rapejsygyspcSeen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 18:03:05Event JSON
{
"id": "eeea1a36616fd1268c9621d4d0e629a1b522efa4009fe1c9f4c1a04c9ad80719",
"pubkey": "c1fb5b269ddf0a717f7af22fb5083fc1bab73205f30f34119e207707687d0e65",
"created_at": 1686160985,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"ee022a6a47410ebc719699fd27bcb9f40f973bf316debe852c8e3ba2037b552c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a23dbf6c6cc83e14cc3df4e56cc71845f611908084cfe620e83e40c06ccdd3d0"
]
],
"content": "đź“… Original date posted:2017-06-11\nđź“ť Original message:Jorge TimĂłn wrote:\n\n\"My preference would be a bip149 proposal that could be merged and\nreleased now, but some people complain that would require more\ntesting, because *if you deploy bip149 and then sw gets activated pre\nnov15, then you want bip149 nodes to use the old service bit for\nsegwit*, not the new one (you would use that one if it activates post\nnov15, so that pre-bip149 nodes don't get confused).\"\n(emphasis added)\n\nWhy not just make sure BIP 149 will never activate unless BIP 141 has\nexpired unsuccessfully? If BIP 141 should unexpectly activate, then\nBIP 149 nodes would notice and act as pre-SegWit nodes indefinitely,\nbut remain in consensus with BIP 141 nodes.\n\nIt might be slightly less convenient for BIP 149 users to upgrade\nagain, but then at least we could start deploying BIP 149 sooner.",
"sig": "3458874b1f263a275131b509eebf582251e3ef8512d98a1897de5fc7d53d97351946eea9694c4c0f2c02f69e3b516476515e0377de80eab86a0a823f1b57ace7"
}