Ultimately there’s no fair or freedom oriented way to do it that I can think of. Maybe the closest thing is if you commit a violent crime or a non violent crime of sufficient impact (steal $10B or something) you lose your right to vote as you’ve shown you are a threat to society by a jury of your peers beyond a reasonable doubt.
However, down this path you end up doing some sort of “purity” test to see if people are more long term or short term oriented and that is hugely flawed and problematic at best. Yes kids are a maybe a half decent proxy of more long term orientation, but there’s plenty of shitty parents and honest people without kids. It’s not a strong enough indicator to take away someone’s fundamental natural rights imo.
The problem of too many people being too short term biased is very real but it’s easy to get to a state where the cure is worse than the disease. Everything I’ve seen on this topic falls under that category to me: would just make it worse.
btconboard #LNHANCE or #CTV
npub15s…el6uv
2024-08-21 21:51:21
in reply to nevent1q…9utv
Author Public Key
npub15ssy34l2ym5ux6n8khljvmzs3zp238d7xmhkq0xfceexxf5gdseqpel6uvPublished at
2024-08-21 21:51:21Event JSON
{
"id": "e389d9b5f402c99ee6074376274afc13988dd39c1aeab1594ea119d1bcb9e787",
"pubkey": "a42048d7ea26e9c36a67b5ff266c508882a89dbe36ef603cc9c6726326886c32",
"created_at": 1724277081,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"078c7497a7e4f663966c2afbfce459b7a87b47ecd606a8b3e923025f43a340c4",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"16f1a0100d4cfffbcc4230e8e0e4290cc5849c1adc64d6653fda07c031b1074b"
],
[
"p",
"c7fe92f80c516c0c54b15e8d256ac07281036d934ea1ff39fb0cd8a0fd677736"
]
],
"content": "Ultimately there’s no fair or freedom oriented way to do it that I can think of. Maybe the closest thing is if you commit a violent crime or a non violent crime of sufficient impact (steal $10B or something) you lose your right to vote as you’ve shown you are a threat to society by a jury of your peers beyond a reasonable doubt.\nHowever, down this path you end up doing some sort of “purity” test to see if people are more long term or short term oriented and that is hugely flawed and problematic at best. Yes kids are a maybe a half decent proxy of more long term orientation, but there’s plenty of shitty parents and honest people without kids. It’s not a strong enough indicator to take away someone’s fundamental natural rights imo. \nThe problem of too many people being too short term biased is very real but it’s easy to get to a state where the cure is worse than the disease. Everything I’ve seen on this topic falls under that category to me: would just make it worse.",
"sig": "d123317b6616378a8f8c81b4b2456ccb131d608fe09b0efa05db88196f09031e9b833660ef416c2824ca465d829523d8ccc3ee86d5de063b918475c448853841"
}