Pavol Rusnak [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š
Original date posted:2014-03-27 š Original message:On 03/27/2014 04:57 PM, ...
š
Original date posted:2014-03-27
š Original message:On 03/27/2014 04:57 PM, Allen Piscitello wrote:
> Don't most of these coins have a magic number already assigned that is
> unique? (0xD9B4BEF9 for Bitcoin, 0x0709110B for Testnet, FBC0XB6DB for
> Litecoin, etc...). This seems like a good candidate for identifying coins,
> and also supports Testnet cases well. Maybe there are some alts without
> such a magic number that might prevent that?
That magic number is something I find very unfortunate and superflous in
BIP-32 design. Its only purpose is to distinguish BIP-32 trees for
various altcoins, but it doesn't make sense at all once you start
storing various altcoins in the same tree using the proposed
/m/cointype/reserved'/account'/change/n scheme.
I would love to see that removed from BIP-32 and use always
0x0488B21E/0x0488ADE4 (xpub/xpriv), but that is for different discussion
I guess.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol Rusnak <stick at gk2.sk>
Published at
2023-06-07 15:16:18Event JSON
{
"id": "e3b2019cb04ec23f7015d1058566d82bd818279bc6ed9db05b533a20559d1b83",
"pubkey": "7631397e469f47f3535567311f5f7c17129e0ff2cb253df015e3d92ddfd92c63",
"created_at": 1686150978,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d9ddea79394f356d989e65ab112610cc90e9929cf3c160da3cfe266aeba22200",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"bc3652fb17ede223343f424611a2bfd18cc8682bb0c4b99524e63d77979b91dd",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"3327325c47cd736ff7b6960a646e8e38456e62cb2aa3cee04ac2560680ca8a3c"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2014-03-27\nš Original message:On 03/27/2014 04:57 PM, Allen Piscitello wrote:\n\u003e Don't most of these coins have a magic number already assigned that is\n\u003e unique? (0xD9B4BEF9 for Bitcoin, 0x0709110B for Testnet, FBC0XB6DB for\n\u003e Litecoin, etc...). This seems like a good candidate for identifying coins,\n\u003e and also supports Testnet cases well. Maybe there are some alts without\n\u003e such a magic number that might prevent that?\n\nThat magic number is something I find very unfortunate and superflous in\nBIP-32 design. Its only purpose is to distinguish BIP-32 trees for\nvarious altcoins, but it doesn't make sense at all once you start\nstoring various altcoins in the same tree using the proposed\n/m/cointype/reserved'/account'/change/n scheme.\n\nI would love to see that removed from BIP-32 and use always\n0x0488B21E/0x0488ADE4 (xpub/xpriv), but that is for different discussion\nI guess.\n\n-- \nBest Regards / S pozdravom,\n\nPavol Rusnak \u003cstick at gk2.sk\u003e",
"sig": "f7b2d5ae174e3f6d8e9c466318c6d3c19e7ffabbe1d6e85ac50c3698f9906b3cf816c2a768f02e5c6eb5b35bd1c1d3bcda100b4d9779b1ec685d7f8935431a81"
}