ODT on Nostr: You call it censorship because you disagree with the content of those transactions, ...
You call it censorship because you disagree with the content of those transactions, which is subjective. Some peeps don't disagree.
Also, ordinals aside, some rich actor could spam Bitcoin without jpegs. Just move sats back and forth between their wallets, paying high fees to block everyone else. Is that spam? Should you block these transactions? I see them as valid. And we need better ways to deal with that situation than filtering whatever the miner sees as spam.
Published at
2023-12-26 08:46:39Event JSON
{
"id": "e3a4c4728daa58a5526a8b7607c3f69e150c46a45b78c74c3068fef1ebfff0e1",
"pubkey": "e3a83a08372bdbb662d6e415fcf5b805ef7bcb0b2387912cadad9d75b12b9a78",
"created_at": 1703580399,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"209a85e5236788c56a1d8e663f23e9d049a55b74ff50f690a050d9aa14d620ca",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"e",
"43a21ebfad03cef24e2caa45c4bc8857e25dfae2d8ddc5b4300809d2f29bb2ae",
"wss://relay.damus.io/",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"e3a83a08372bdbb662d6e415fcf5b805ef7bcb0b2387912cadad9d75b12b9a78"
],
[
"p",
"d14aba73544c33264a54cdf4c9355f957e76b1e10c21f8b6d522f308c635a8eb"
]
],
"content": "You call it censorship because you disagree with the content of those transactions, which is subjective. Some peeps don't disagree.\nAlso, ordinals aside, some rich actor could spam Bitcoin without jpegs. Just move sats back and forth between their wallets, paying high fees to block everyone else. Is that spam? Should you block these transactions? I see them as valid. And we need better ways to deal with that situation than filtering whatever the miner sees as spam. ",
"sig": "a41281eed1bd1051c486a9df93f07ff857f6b6e2e94501bb31259282f4017cbd2706ccdbdd0e73e1118e2fdcfc74e0ac79cc3ff3e2cbc8938603be104745a16b"
}