Event JSON
{
"id": "ed0a9b9ee30aedea9dcf46bb573e223907c2fd54b85cdfedf9d3d408da0cd552",
"pubkey": "d9009e362586e2b4a5e1eac8002380b47760cf03ac30cd7cdb5169da678e9caa",
"created_at": 1747255972,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"EDPB"
],
[
"t",
"consent"
],
[
"t",
"t"
],
[
"imeta",
"url https://eupolicy.social/system/media_attachments/files/114/508/164/059/877/885/original/3022f34c33175b0b.jpg",
"m image/jpeg",
"dim 800x1422",
"blurhash U44:Hy?wDjM-xvtQWVRk4UIV%Mt7NMRQoftQ"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://eupolicy.social/users/gateklons/statuses/114508167407367529",
"activitypub"
],
[
"client",
"Mostr",
"31990:6be38f8c63df7dbf84db7ec4a6e6fbbd8d19dca3b980efad18585c46f04b26f9:mostr",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
]
],
"content": "NEW BLOGPOST: what's being overlooked about Meta's (defeat in) challenging the #EDPB #consent-or-pay opinion (case #T-319/24)\n\nhttps://open.substack.com/pub/gateklons/p/the-overlooked-implications-of-metas?r=3ktc0b\u0026utm_campaign=post\u0026utm_medium=web\n\nhttps://eupolicy.social/system/media_attachments/files/114/508/164/059/877/885/original/3022f34c33175b0b.jpg",
"sig": "95473282549ad5e8e0a584f56489ff4b255875607e795b52823475e4aa8dbc5ff92af94d00d95522a634ebeb7d69c026ea9500577e33252ae98d9c34ebbc6545"
}
