📅 Original date posted:2014-03-12
📝 Original message:On 03/12/2014 08:26 PM, Jean-Paul Kogelman wrote:
> So upon entering a password with a typo, the user will not be notified of an
> error, but be presented with a wallet balance of 0, after the blockchain has
> been scanned. I'm sorry, but that's not the kind of experience I would want to
> present to my users.
Sure, you can have either plausible deniability or typo checking, not
both at the same time.
> Would you care to elaborate how optional outsourcing of the KDF breaks
> compatibility?
I'm afraid one would end up with code generated in one client that is
unusable in a different client, because the client's developer thought
that using fancier algorithm instead of the proposed ones was a good idea.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol Rusnak <stick at gk2.sk>
Pavol Rusnak [ARCHIVE] /
npub1wc…3hnuq
2023-06-07 15:15:15
in reply to nevent1q…ake0
Author Public Key
npub1wccnjljxnarlx564vuc37hmuzuffurljevjnmuq4u0vjmh7e933sn3hnuqPublished at
2023-06-07 15:15:15Event JSON
{
"id": "ed420a0bf7f4b476f2a9754cf7dac9a15e771b94be2eed226b76061a58d6692a",
"pubkey": "7631397e469f47f3535567311f5f7c17129e0ff2cb253df015e3d92ddfd92c63",
"created_at": 1686150915,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"e2b06c13dda090fd765a6fae17847c84821995c150a37c86a1dca89140911552",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"d888c7f24dd10db95adf7d27fa73bf03abbbc0d64feba0d6abdc6149259f991f",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"874fa44d110b2119208ba6fb27607799f16a00c82143201ad7f179a89f0df349"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-03-12\n📝 Original message:On 03/12/2014 08:26 PM, Jean-Paul Kogelman wrote:\n\u003e So upon entering a password with a typo, the user will not be notified of an \n\u003e error, but be presented with a wallet balance of 0, after the blockchain has \n\u003e been scanned. I'm sorry, but that's not the kind of experience I would want to \n\u003e present to my users.\n\nSure, you can have either plausible deniability or typo checking, not\nboth at the same time.\n\n\u003e Would you care to elaborate how optional outsourcing of the KDF breaks \n\u003e compatibility?\n\nI'm afraid one would end up with code generated in one client that is\nunusable in a different client, because the client's developer thought\nthat using fancier algorithm instead of the proposed ones was a good idea.\n\n\n-- \nBest Regards / S pozdravom,\n\nPavol Rusnak \u003cstick at gk2.sk\u003e",
"sig": "5f2ffbef4271d56cab35ffed8d85a59a9b29db4008bcac33a78e1c541d514ec3a1e3149dfa04f0295c92b056a7d4d0c2d9515c51bbef815b86789f95bf2a7ab7"
}