slipstream on Nostr: I get that, as a system, less outbox relays (ie avoiding full replication to every ...
I get that, as a system, less outbox relays (ie avoiding full replication to every relay) is important for scaling nostr.
But why should I, as a greedy individual that wants max censorship resistance for my own posts, not send my notes to hundreds of relays (assuming I have the bandwidth)? Clients can slowly send them out in the background without affecting my UX.
Are we building a system that relies on altruistic behaviour to scale?
Published at
2024-11-01 10:58:39Event JSON
{
"id": "ed073ec492449ea474f95a013272bd23c8273f69d202321f881069b273458dce",
"pubkey": "6f7ca33895bd7caf4880de0ce3b4571100745c7a8d710e0b35412f3e291c6538",
"created_at": 1730458719,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"37a0336155b9b259195bb737fffd031fc5da72e6ce91614ffb0ace04b7b6f8fd",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"126103bfddc8df256b6e0abfd7f3797c80dcc4ea88f7c2f87dd4104220b4d65f"
],
[
"p",
"3f770d65d3a764a9c5cb503ae123e62ec7598ad035d836e2a810f3877a745b24"
]
],
"content": "I get that, as a system, less outbox relays (ie avoiding full replication to every relay) is important for scaling nostr.\n\nBut why should I, as a greedy individual that wants max censorship resistance for my own posts, not send my notes to hundreds of relays (assuming I have the bandwidth)? Clients can slowly send them out in the background without affecting my UX.\n\nAre we building a system that relies on altruistic behaviour to scale?",
"sig": "78ad26318a0793b696443ba6a305c196cb9f814dfc3bf582c1a2449f44f871abe44f62cc9a86ea08c4f6b34c68f033f9c98a150cba41710d1d1eb2cadd575e44"
}