📅 Original date posted:2015-11-14
📝 Original message:On Friday, November 13, 2015 06:58:07 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:48 PM, xor via bitcoin-dev <
>
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > This clearly says that funds can be frozen.
> > Can the BIP65-thing be used to freeze funds or can it not be?
>
> This language definitely trips up or worries several folks - it's been
> mentioned a few times before.
>
> The user _chooses_ to freeze _their own_ funds. It is not an unwilling act
> of force, which many assume when they see the phrase "freeze funds."
Oh, interesting, albeit that was not subject of my question.
My question in fact was whether *I* can use it to freeze *my* funds; because I
think that would be an interesting feature for various purposes.
From the state of BIP65 I talked about, it is not even clear whether that is
possible.
Your observation beyond that is a valid concern though.
So both should be addressed.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151114/d16fea08/attachment.sig>;
xor [ARCHIVE] /
npub14a…g6tv3
2023-06-07 17:44:51
in reply to nevent1q…amqe
Author Public Key
npub14a7v3r4ppfy007s0tk2h0ujh38h9x4t6jyrndev9qmmazd2vrsvqxg6tv3Seen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 17:44:51Event JSON
{
"id": "ed34fb97845b5041ef10707845a6b30827bce4b1c33cbc0c5beaace5c312e1b6",
"pubkey": "af7cc88ea10a48f7fa0f5d9577f25789ee53557a910736e58506f7d1354c1c18",
"created_at": 1686159891,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"daf39e0a1dbaca24b6e2fe7def727146701a8f2511c7e675caee839a069071e5",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"30f57101f97dc55e781970494c630eda471f4bd74268a86c5f6cb96c11d6aee6",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-11-14\n📝 Original message:On Friday, November 13, 2015 06:58:07 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:\n\u003e On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:48 PM, xor via bitcoin-dev \u003c\n\u003e \n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e This clearly says that funds can be frozen.\n\u003e \u003e Can the BIP65-thing be used to freeze funds or can it not be?\n\u003e \n\u003e This language definitely trips up or worries several folks - it's been\n\u003e mentioned a few times before.\n\u003e \n\u003e The user _chooses_ to freeze _their own_ funds. It is not an unwilling act\n\u003e of force, which many assume when they see the phrase \"freeze funds.\"\n\nOh, interesting, albeit that was not subject of my question.\n\nMy question in fact was whether *I* can use it to freeze *my* funds; because I \nthink that would be an interesting feature for various purposes.\nFrom the state of BIP65 I talked about, it is not even clear whether that is \npossible.\n\nYour observation beyond that is a valid concern though.\nSo both should be addressed.\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 836 bytes\nDesc: This is a digitally signed message part.\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151114/d16fea08/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "d9102c11aac1e6f3ad65721198adfe64f0320375294b37756feaf1b33f90d40214d1f95f6e5dd935aea21584e7eddfa7bb7d821fea567ac4e7a0b3e92040df69"
}