Andy Parkins [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š
Original date posted:2011-12-16 šļø Summary of this message: A discussion on ...
š
Original date posted:2011-12-16
šļø Summary of this message: A discussion on proposals for standard URLs, with one participant suggesting reviewing RFCs for examples of alternative approaches.
š Original message:On 2011 December 16 Friday, Rick Wesson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:07 PM, slush <slush at centrum.cz> wrote:
> > I really like this proposal with standard URLs. All other proposals like
> > DNS mapping or email aliases converted to URLs with some weird logic
> > looks strange to me.
>
> wow, really. Maybe you could review some RFCs, there are thousands of
> examples where some really smart engineers chose the exact opposite
> path which you propose below.
Could you point me at an example?
Andy
--
Dr Andy Parkins
andyparkins at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20111216/017b7ff8/attachment.sig>
Published at
2023-06-07 02:47:54Event JSON
{
"id": "ed1fc5aaeb3b45e7295c91bf2758d9eb68772ad75b10f27fa7fc05b2be9c57f7",
"pubkey": "99bec497728c848e65549d1a5257d08de97621edcb4b77073269a45dac708d59",
"created_at": 1686106074,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f45e7ca88e6eb3dd1e645e8e3cbb476c5b24e8003cb71eebe205594bb2a4d152",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"cfa4c8c9b0b9cb6cacee01b134760bf1866c65a3fb3dbe77a5eaec899bbb12ae",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"eb7ca795057ca7cabde6f541c741e661d013414934e5934c2e04c6677625c99a"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2011-12-16\nšļø Summary of this message: A discussion on proposals for standard URLs, with one participant suggesting reviewing RFCs for examples of alternative approaches.\nš Original message:On 2011 December 16 Friday, Rick Wesson wrote:\n\u003e On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:07 PM, slush \u003cslush at centrum.cz\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e I really like this proposal with standard URLs. All other proposals like\n\u003e \u003e DNS mapping or email aliases converted to URLs with some weird logic\n\u003e \u003e looks strange to me.\n\u003e \n\u003e wow, really. Maybe you could review some RFCs, there are thousands of\n\u003e examples where some really smart engineers chose the exact opposite\n\u003e path which you propose below.\n\nCould you point me at an example?\n\n\nAndy\n\n-- \nDr Andy Parkins\nandyparkins at gmail.com\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 198 bytes\nDesc: This is a digitally signed message part.\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20111216/017b7ff8/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "c3f06a5c36446c21743c76119dbf44a587a549c1101d608d26fdd46e22550385731132157adc3f9401305036493c1029f69816d5d698fe64be9c9303cd09b127"
}