waxwing on Nostr: Inverse correlation seems plausible, literal inverse proportion seems a bit too ...
Inverse correlation seems plausible, literal inverse proportion seems a bit too specific a claim. I guess that's the biggest problem with your analysis here generally; it's basically impossible to know loss rate, and any assumptions about it are just that. I certainly agree it's interesting to think it through, though, starting from the simplest possible model.
Published at
2025-06-09 02:38:58Event JSON
{
"id": "ea2f29c518e0f3849b70ccf6f433fa1b8fae9386a21ca7d3fd8d6b090b17b066",
"pubkey": "675b84fe75e216ab947c7438ee519ca7775376ddf05dadfba6278bd012e1d728",
"created_at": 1749436738,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"453e32af058777521b093e59701d0dfffd6a6cbc5ca296e6b4926fefd5b3281c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"ea652afd920ca4d21d8d3ab10cfaaf51ae0fa45fbd93ece106a3fbc31496a4ba"
],
[
"e",
"7e4f39fec19c172ead4e3f422f8b9db37c6dde6f947c0ababbcb95775f8cbf57",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"675b84fe75e216ab947c7438ee519ca7775376ddf05dadfba6278bd012e1d728"
],
[
"p",
"ccaa58e37c99c85bc5e754028a718bd46485e5d3cb3345691ecab83c755d48cc"
]
],
"content": "Inverse correlation seems plausible, literal inverse proportion seems a bit too specific a claim. I guess that's the biggest problem with your analysis here generally; it's basically impossible to know loss rate, and any assumptions about it are just that. I certainly agree it's interesting to think it through, though, starting from the simplest possible model.",
"sig": "0e92b15e4296fc2688ef92ccf8dc40ced9cd26dcb067abde485e5444386b5d76ccd78c94dca6a95eb9c47683673afda76d2386ffc49f433187284bf22d66f19c"
}
